- From: Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>
- Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2011 08:50:07 +0200
- To: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- CC: "public-prov-wg@w3.org" <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Ok I'll try Paul On Aug 5, 2011, at 1:01, Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote: > Hi Paul, > > It's unlikely that we will be able to update the text of these > definitions before we go on vacation. > So, if you have the opportunity to refine/suggest text, we will gladly > incorporate it in this > release of the document. > > Regards, > Luc > > On 25/07/11 13:30, Paolo Missier wrote: >> Paul >> >> no doubt. I think we can uniformly treat these as extensions, and >> indeed make them part of our spec (which would then comprise of a core >> + default extensions), /and/ use them as examples of useful extensions. >> >> -Paolo >> >> >> >> On 7/25/11 12:28 PM, Paul Groth wrote: >>> Hi Paolo, >>> >>> I think specialized is a fine word to use. I just would argue that their >>> are some "extensions" that belong in the conceptual model. I think Reza >>> has been making this point well that the model should be "useful" for >>> common cases to help adoption. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Paul >> >> >
Received on Friday, 5 August 2011 06:50:36 UTC