- From: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2011 00:01:48 +0100
- To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
Hi Paul, It's unlikely that we will be able to update the text of these definitions before we go on vacation. So, if you have the opportunity to refine/suggest text, we will gladly incorporate it in this release of the document. Regards, Luc On 25/07/11 13:30, Paolo Missier wrote: > Paul > > no doubt. I think we can uniformly treat these as extensions, and > indeed make them part of our spec (which would then comprise of a core > + default extensions), /and/ use them as examples of useful extensions. > > -Paolo > > > > On 7/25/11 12:28 PM, Paul Groth wrote: >> Hi Paolo, >> >> I think specialized is a fine word to use. I just would argue that their >> are some "extensions" that belong in the conceptual model. I think Reza >> has been making this point well that the model should be "useful" for >> common cases to help adoption. >> >> Thanks, >> Paul > >
Received on Thursday, 4 August 2011 23:02:34 UTC