Re: playing with pil ontology

On 15/08/11 19:43, Myers, Jim wrote:
> In any case - probably more discussion required - I just didn't want 'collection' as an aggregate entity concept to get lumped together with the account/provenance doc/prov container and cause additional confusion.
>    

+1

Luc

Received on Tuesday, 23 August 2011 22:20:32 UTC