- From: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
- Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 15:48:13 +0100
- To: Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>
- CC: "public-prov-wg@w3.org" <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Paul, I think we need to focus first on finding common understanding and consensus for a simple provenance model. If we get this bit right, I think the representations for the kinds of use-case indicated here should fall naturally into place. If they don't, I'd consider that a problem with the model. The discovery process is a separate matter. #g -- On 24/08/2011 21:31, Paul Groth wrote: > Hi all, > > Have a look at: > > http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=1229920&ctx=cb&src=cb&cbid=vamttps342np&cbrank=4 > > > Do you think we need to support bubbling up more of the information in the model > into the PAQ to handle these kind of use cases? > > thanks, > Paul >
Received on Thursday, 25 August 2011 14:55:34 UTC