- From: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2011 00:21:31 +0100
- To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
Hi Graham, Thanks, you have the same response as Olaf. I followed with this comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-prov-wg/2011Aug/0306.html Again, it's about allowing applications to make intelligent choices. We don't offer them this opportunity, because nothing distinguishes the various options. Cheers, Luc On 25/08/11 15:01, Graham Klyne wrote: > On 22/08/2011 23:50, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: >> >> PROV-ISSUE-78 (contexts-and-provenance-uris): multiple contexts and >> provenance-uris [Accessing and Querying Provenance] >> >> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/78 >> >> Raised by: Luc Moreau >> On product: Accessing and Querying Provenance >> >> >> We seem to allow for multiple context-uris and provenance-uris to be >> provided. >> I am fine with this. >> >> But don't we want to be able to say, for instance: >> >> context-uri1 provenance-uri1 >> context-uri1 provenance-uri2 >> context-uri2 provenance-uri3 >> context-uri2 provenance-uri4 >> >> Do we want to be able to express this? Can this be expressed? > > It can be expressed usingthe HTTP Link: header, but not using the HTML > <link> element. > > I discussed this with Paul, and we agreed between ourselves that it's > not a problem. I'm planning to add some more introductory text that I > hope will provide some (ahem) context for this. I propose we discuss > further when I've done that. > > #g > -- >
Received on Thursday, 25 August 2011 23:23:27 UTC