- From: Simon Miles <simon.miles@kcl.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2011 10:16:53 +0100
- To: Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Hi Paul, all, As a general point, these rely on the concept "is a sub-relation of". It's clear what this means in the formal model, because RDFS contains this concept, but it is not yet clear what it means in, or that it is any part of, the language/conceptual model. This is part of the issue of how the language can be extended to include domain-specific information, which might (or might not) allow new "sub-relations" [1]. [1] http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/65 Thanks, Simon On 9 August 2011 10:06, Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl> wrote: > Hi All, > > I've added some shortcuts/extensions to the Provenance Model document. > > see > http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/model/ProvenanceModel.html#shortcuts-and-extensions > > I attempted to define the following in terms of the existing constructs > in the model: > > Quotation > Attribution > Summary > Original Source > > What do you think? > > Thanks, > Paul > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. > For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email > ______________________________________________________________________ > -- Dr Simon Miles Lecturer, Department of Informatics Kings College London, WC2R 2LS, UK +44 (0)20 7848 1166
Received on Tuesday, 9 August 2011 09:17:20 UTC