- From: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 22:01:43 +0100
- To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
Hi Khalid, This issue was closed, pending review. Are you satisfied with the changes? Can we close it? Alternatively, you can reopen it, or create a more specific issue. Thanks, Luc On 21/07/11 20:06, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: > PROV-ISSUE-35: Section 4: How one would know that two BOBs are characterizations of the same entity? [Conceptual Model] > > http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/35 > > Raised by: Khalid Belhajjame > On product: Conceptual Model > > > Do we need a mean to specify that two BOB are characterizations of the same entity? > > In the initial draft, I think that the editors intentionally avoided defining the term "entity" as part of the vocabulary. I don't suggest defining that term, but having a means by which one would know that two Bobs are characterizations, possibly different, of the same entity, e.g., using an assertion like "sameEntity(bob1, bob2)". > > I think this will be useful, amongst other things, in the definition of IVPof. > > Khalid > > > >
Received on Monday, 22 August 2011 21:03:28 UTC