W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > August 2011

Re: PROV-ISSUE-33: Section 3.1 and Section 3.2: example of IVPof [Conceptual Model]

From: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 22:01:06 +0100
Message-ID: <EMEW3|587a960fb6963e3e72737493d54189f5n7LM1B08L.Moreau|ecs.soton.ac.uk|4E52C392.3050700@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
Hi Khalid,
This issue was closed, pending review.
Are you satisfied with the changes? Can we
close it? Alternatively, you can reopen it,
or create a more specific issue.
Thanks,
Luc


On 21/07/11 19:54, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
> PROV-ISSUE-33: Section 3.1 and Section 3.2: example of IVPof  [Conceptual Model]
>
> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/33
>
> Raised by: Khalid Belhajjame
> On product: Conceptual Model
>
>
> I notice in the file example that there is a single level of IVPof. It would be good if we can extend the example to have for example IVPof(e2,e0) and IVPof(e6,e2). e6 may be for example:
> bob(e6, [ type: "File", location: "/shared/crime.txt", creator: "Alice", content: "There was a lot of crime in London last month.", comment = "the content of this file does not convey the opinion of the company the author is an employee of"]). In other words, I simply added a new attribute to e2.
>
> Khalid
>
>
>
>
>    
Received on Monday, 22 August 2011 21:01:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:51:00 UTC