W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > August 2011

Re: [PAQ] rel="me"

From: Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 10:56:52 -0400
Message-ID: <4E5662B4.8000702@vu.nl>
To: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
CC: "public-prov-wg@w3.org" <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Hi Graham,

Ok, I agree with that. So maybe this should be a model discussion.

The main thing is that I think we would have more impact by supporting 
current community practices.

Thanks,
Paul

Graham Klyne wrote:
> Paul,
>
> I think we need to focus first on finding common understanding and consensus for
> a simple provenance model.
>
> If we get this bit right, I think the representations for the kinds of use-case
> indicated here should fall naturally into place.  If they don't, I'd consider
> that a problem with the model.  The discovery process is a separate matter.
>
> #g
> --
>
>
> On 24/08/2011 21:31, Paul Groth wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Have a look at:
>>
>> http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=1229920&ctx=cb&src=cb&cbid=vamttps342np&cbrank=4
>>
>>
>> Do you think we need to support bubbling up more of the information in the model
>> into the PAQ to handle these kind of use cases?
>>
>> thanks,
>> Paul
>>

-- 
Dr. Paul Groth (p.t.groth@vu.nl)
http://www.few.vu.nl/~pgroth/
Assistant Professor
Knowledge Representation & Reasoning Group
Artificial Intelligence Section
Department of Computer Science
VU University Amsterdam
Received on Thursday, 25 August 2011 14:57:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:51:00 UTC