- From: Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>
- Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 10:56:52 -0400
- To: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
- CC: "public-prov-wg@w3.org" <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Hi Graham, Ok, I agree with that. So maybe this should be a model discussion. The main thing is that I think we would have more impact by supporting current community practices. Thanks, Paul Graham Klyne wrote: > Paul, > > I think we need to focus first on finding common understanding and consensus for > a simple provenance model. > > If we get this bit right, I think the representations for the kinds of use-case > indicated here should fall naturally into place. If they don't, I'd consider > that a problem with the model. The discovery process is a separate matter. > > #g > -- > > > On 24/08/2011 21:31, Paul Groth wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Have a look at: >> >> http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=1229920&ctx=cb&src=cb&cbid=vamttps342np&cbrank=4 >> >> >> Do you think we need to support bubbling up more of the information in the model >> into the PAQ to handle these kind of use cases? >> >> thanks, >> Paul >> -- Dr. Paul Groth (p.t.groth@vu.nl) http://www.few.vu.nl/~pgroth/ Assistant Professor Knowledge Representation & Reasoning Group Artificial Intelligence Section Department of Computer Science VU University Amsterdam
Received on Thursday, 25 August 2011 14:57:22 UTC