Re: PROV-ISSUE-66 (is-execution-a-bob): Why is process execution not defined as a characterised entity? [Conceptual Model] from Luc Moreau on 2011-08-22 (public-prov-wg@w3.org from August 2011)

From: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 22:12:26 +0100
To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <EMEW3|cc7518f18a61dc4ecc49c6addb10d192n7LMCp08L.Moreau|ecs.soton.ac.uk|4E52C63A>

Hi Simon,
This issue was closed, pending review.
Are you satisfied with the changes? Can we
close it? Alternatively, you can reopen it,
or create a more specific issue.
Thanks,
Luc

PS See note on this issue's page



On 29/07/11 17:22, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
> PROV-ISSUE-66 (is-execution-a-bob): Why is process execution not defined as a characterised entity? [Conceptual Model]
>
> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/66
>
> Raised by: Simon Miles
> On product: Conceptual Model
>
> This was mentioned by Satya in the call, but I can't see it having been raised as an issue yet.
>
> As process executions are identified and may have attributes, including start and end time, are they kinds of characterised entities, similarly to agent? If not, why not?
>
>
>
>
>

Received on Monday, 22 August 2011 21:13:17 UTC