public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org from November 2016 by subject

[Editorial] Create section header for focus node

Beware: Weekly meetings extended and starting at 8am ET for now

Call for Exclusions (update): SHACL Core Abstract Syntax and Semantics

Call to action

Introduction and SHACL implementation

IRC log?

ISSUE-140: Suggestion to close

ISSUE-158: Request to review change

Issue-185 filter execution ordering

ISSUE-188: Switched to "conforms"

ISSUE-194: sh:stem implementation

java implementation of ShEx

LIst of outstanding comments

Minimalist "validate" solution

MUST vs is/are

Proposal to close ISSUE-189

RDF Data Shapes WG Agenda for 16 November 2016

RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 2 November 2016

RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 23 November 2016

RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 30 November 2016

RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 9 November 2016

RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for 16 November 2016

RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for 2 November 2016

RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for 23 November 2016

RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for 9 November 2016

Remaining issues with impact on the syntax

Review of editorial changes for the last two weeks

shapes-ACTION-44: Fork an experiment without "validation"

shapes-ACTION-45: Propose text for issue-192

shapes-ACTION-46: Propose changes to the definition of validation to close issue-185

shapes-ACTION-47: Review test suite and compare with shex tesst suite

shapes-ISSUE-192 (Are filters shapes?) - final questions

shapes-ISSUE-193 (Focus nodes): Targets can be refined; focus nodes do not change

shapes-ISSUE-194 (valueStem): stems in value sets

shapes-ISSUE-195 (TTL File): [Editorial] Prepare TTL file for publication [SHACL Spec]

shapes-ISSUE-196 (Delete filters): Should we delete filter shapes? [SHACL Spec]

shapes-ISSUE-197 (Defined ): "Defined" and "declared" used in multiple ways, and not defined [SHACL Spec]

shapes-ISSUE-198 (rdf:langString): rdf:langString not included in datatypes [SHACL Spec]

shapes-ISSUE-199 (Constraint component IRIs): [Editorial] Constraint Component IRIs need to be defined before use [SHACL Spec]

shapes-ISSUE-200 (Processors/ing): [Editorial] Processors, processing not defined [SHACL Spec]

shapes-ISSUE-201 (node target): how does node target specify targets for a shape? [SHACL Spec]

shapes-ISSUE-202 (Remove pre-binding from core): Suggestion to remove pre-binding from core [SHACL - Core]

shapes-ISSUE-203 (Constraint components): Constraint component is an IRI [SHACL Spec]

shapes-ISSUE-204 (Constraint node): Fourth node is unclear [SHACL Spec]

shapes-ISSUE-205 (Validation report): Section 1.4 - graph is the result of validation [SHACL Spec]

shapes-ISSUE-206 (Target node): Not clear how a node target specifies targets for a shape [SHACL Spec]

shapes-ISSUE-207 (Parameters): Parameter descriptions for constraint components [SHACL Spec]

shapes-ISSUE-208 ($THIS): $this in aggregations [SHACL Spec]

shapes-ISSUE-209 (What is a shape?): What is a shape [SHACL Spec]

shapes-ISSUE-210 (Expected type): value types and expected types [SHACL Spec]

shapes-ISSUE-211 (property constraints): Eliminate property constraints [SHACL Spec]

shapes-ISSUE-212 (Property constraints): Property constraints and focus node constraints [SHACL Spec]

shapes-ISSUE-213 (Finding shapes): Finding shapes [SHACL Spec]

Summary of this week's edits

Time of WG Weekly calls (again)

TopQuadrant's test cases added

Validation with "conforms"

WG Process (was Re: shapes-ISSUE-197 (Defined ): "Defined" and "declared" used in multiple ways, and not defined [SHACL Spec)]

Last message date: Wednesday, 30 November 2016 13:51:58 UTC