Re: shapes-ISSUE-195 (TTL File): [Editorial] Prepare TTL file for publication [SHACL Spec]

I have cleaned up the Turtle file for SHACL (esp the labels and 
comments) and there is now a link to that file in the Conformance section:

TheTurtle serialization of the SHACL vocabulary 
<http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/shacl/shacl.ttl>is part of the 
normative specification. However, the values 
of|rdfs:label|and|rdfs:comment|in that file are not normative.

I am not sure how we can best review this large file as a group. I did 
my best to check its correctness and our implementation also uses that 
very file at run-time, passing all test cases. In any case, I would 
appreciate feedback.

Holger


On 15/11/2016 15:46, RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
> shapes-ISSUE-195 (TTL File): [Editorial] Prepare TTL file for publication [SHACL Spec]
>
> http://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/track/issues/195
>
> Raised by: Holger Knublauch
> On product: SHACL Spec
>
> The Turtle file of the SHACL namespace is normative part of the spec. Before going to CR status we need to clean this file up and make sure it has a URI under which it can be reached. Maybe it could even be uploaded to the final place.
>
> The TTL file also needs clean up, at least in its rdfs:comments, to make sure it aligns with the current spec.
>
>
>