- From: RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 22:34:55 +0000
- To: public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org
shapes-ISSUE-198 (rdf:langString): rdf:langString not included in datatypes [SHACL Spec] http://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/track/issues/198 Raised by: Karen Coyle On product: SHACL Spec >From email of 31 October 2016:[2] >> *Karen* >> This checks the ^^xsd:X literals. sh:nodeKind checks for IRI, bnode, >> or literal. There's one more type in RDF 1.1 [1] which is the >> "language-tagged string". We have sh:uniqueLang and sh:languageIn, but >> is there also a need to check that a literal is language-tagged? > *Holger* > Being language-tagged is already checked via sh:datatype rdf:langString. > So I think that's handled OK. OK, but the terminology entry for "datatype" cites RDF 1.1 concepts, and rdf:langString doesn't appear in that document. It is defined in RDF Schema 1.1, though.[1] Does that mean it should be listed specifically with RDFS as its reference? kc [1] https://www.w3.org/TR/2014/REC-rdf-schema-20140225/#ch_langstring [2]https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-data-shapes-wg/2016Nov/0001.html ***Proposal*** Modify definition of datatypes in SHACL to include rdf:langString from RDF schema. Also, is rdfs:Literal also needed?
Received on Thursday, 17 November 2016 22:35:01 UTC