W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org > November 2016

Re: shapes-ISSUE-192 (Are filters shapes?) - final questions

From: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2016 07:48:18 -0700
To: public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <70548e1e-b88b-2a7c-0993-290a67525bae@kcoyle.net>
As decided at the meeting:

On 10/28/16 9:39 AM, Karen Coyle wrote:
> *QUESTION 1: What does it mean for a target to be "processed" as a
> value? It's the term "processed" here that is problematic. Perhaps an
> example would help, and then we could tweak the language.

Proposed: The target of a shape that is the value of another shape MUST 
be ignored.

(Alternate: The target *in* a shape... - I'm not sure what language we 
are using for the various components of shapes. It could be "The target 
that is a component of a shape ..." Any of those would be ok with me as 
long as we are consistent.)

> *QUESTION 2: Does "are" here mean "MUST"? (This is a question throughout
> the document, actually, wherever "are" is used in this way. Perhaps we
> can decide once for all.)

Yes, MUST must be used here.

Karen Coyle
kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net
m: 1-510-435-8234
skype: kcoylenet/+1-510-984-3600
Received on Wednesday, 2 November 2016 14:48:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 2 November 2016 14:48:53 UTC