Re: shapes-ISSUE-204 (Constraint node): Fourth node is unclear [SHACL Spec] from Holger Knublauch on 2016-11-22 (public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org from November 2016)

From: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2016 16:13:10 +1000
To: public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <f62faa6f-055c-76fd-3f2a-8256813f5a7f@topquadrant.com>

I had already addressed this and Peter said it's now "Better":

https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-shapes/2016Nov/0017.html

I suggest closing and sending this as response to Peter.

Holger


On 21/11/2016 6:36, RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
> shapes-ISSUE-204 (Constraint node): Fourth node is unclear [SHACL Spec]
>
> http://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/track/issues/204
>
> Raised by: Karen Coyle
> On product: SHACL Spec
>
> >From Peter's email: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-shapes/2016Nov/0000.html
>
> ""A constraint is a node in the shapes graph".  The first example, in Section
> 1.4, talks about four constraints.  Three of these are obvious nodes in example
> shapes graph, but the node for the fourth is unclear."
>
>
>

Received on Tuesday, 22 November 2016 06:13:45 UTC