- From: RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2016 20:46:56 +0000
- To: public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org
shapes-ISSUE-207 (Parameters): Parameter descriptions for constraint components [SHACL Spec] http://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/track/issues/207 Raised by: Karen Coyle On product: SHACL Spec Last email: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-shapes/2016Oct/0062.html However, the list parameters are not uniformly described - see sh:in vs sh:languageIn. As well, in some cases an example is given but in most there is no example. So there is still variability in wording. I think that it is up to the working group to put in the effort to check the parameter descriptions to see if there are any problems. peter
Received on Sunday, 20 November 2016 20:47:02 UTC