public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org from January 2008 by author

Ben Adida

• telecon in a few hours (Thursday, 31 January)
• Re: Section 1 of the New RDFa Syntax Draft ready for reviews (Tuesday, 29 January)
• Re: Section 1 of the New RDFa Syntax Draft ready for reviews (Monday, 28 January)
• New RDFa Syntax Draft ready for reviews (Friday, 25 January)
• Telecon in a few hours - 1600 UTC Thursday (Thursday, 24 January)
• Re: Trackback in RDFa (Wednesday, 23 January)
• Re: Exact wording for non-prefixed CURIEs in @rel/@rev (Tuesday, 22 January)
• Re: Thoughts on @href/@resource completing hanging @rels (Tuesday, 22 January)
• Re: Exact wording for non-prefixed CURIEs in @rel/@rev (Tuesday, 22 January)
• Re: Does @instanceof apply to @href? (Tuesday, 22 January)
• Re: Exact wording for non-prefixed CURIEs in @rel/@rev (Tuesday, 22 January)
• Re: capturing reserved keywords in @rel (Tuesday, 22 January)
• Re: capturing reserved keywords in @rel (Tuesday, 22 January)
• Re: capturing reserved keywords in @rel (Tuesday, 22 January)
• Re: Does @instanceof apply to @href? (Tuesday, 22 January)
• Re: capturing reserved keywords in @rel (Tuesday, 22 January)
• Re: Thoughts on @src becoming equivalent to @about (Tuesday, 22 January)
• Re: Does @instanceof apply to @href? (Monday, 21 January)
• Re: Does @instanceof apply to @href? (Monday, 21 January)
• capturing reserved keywords in @rel (Monday, 21 January)
• Re: Thoughts on @href/@resource completing hanging @rels (Monday, 21 January)
• Re: finding closure on the issues (Monday, 21 January)
• Re: finding closure on the issues (Monday, 21 January)
• finding closure on the issues (Monday, 21 January)
• Re: FYI: another usage proposal for RDFa (Friday, 18 January)
• Re: running tests locally (Thursday, 17 January)
• Re: running tests locally (Thursday, 17 January)
• telecon (Thursday, 17 January)
• Re: playing devil's advocate to my chaining+@src proposals (Wednesday, 16 January)
• playing devil's advocate to my chaining+@src proposals (Wednesday, 16 January)
• Re: status of non-prefixed values in @rel (Wednesday, 16 January)
• Re: Proposal for addressing non-prefixed values in @rel/@rev (Wednesday, 16 January)
• Re: status of non-prefixed values in @rel (Wednesday, 16 January)
• Re: status of non-prefixed values in @rel (Wednesday, 16 January)
• Re: status of non-prefixed values in @rel (Wednesday, 16 January)
• Re: status of non-prefixed values in @rel (Wednesday, 16 January)
• Re: status of non-prefixed values in @rel (Wednesday, 16 January)
• Re: status of non-prefixed values in @rel (Tuesday, 15 January)
• Re: status of non-prefixed values in @rel (Saturday, 12 January)
• status of non-prefixed values in @rel (Saturday, 12 January)
• Re: Summary of @href/@resource completing triples issue (v2.0) (Thursday, 10 January)
• Re: Summary of @href/@resource completing triples issue (v2.0) (Thursday, 10 January)
• a graphic of my mental model (Thursday, 10 January)
• Re: Test Cases for 2008-01-10 telecon (Thursday, 10 January)
• Re: Test Cases for 2008-01-10 telecon (Thursday, 10 January)
• Re: Summary of @href/@resource completing triples issue (v2.0) (Thursday, 10 January)
• Re: Test Cases for 2008-01-10 telecon (Thursday, 10 January)
• Re: Least-damage approach to @href/@resource completing triples (Thursday, 10 January)
• Telecon Thursday, 1600 UTC (Thursday, 10 January)
• Re: Summary of @href/@resource completing triples issue (Wednesday, 9 January)
• Re: Do the following examples generate any triples? (Tuesday, 8 January)
• Re: Does @resource/@href complete hanging rels? (was Rethinking @src in the context of chaining rules) (Tuesday, 8 January)
• Re: Rethinking @src in the context of chaining rules (Tuesday, 8 January)
• Re: Rethinking @src in the context of chaining rules (Tuesday, 8 January)
• Re: Rethinking @src in the context of chaining rules (Tuesday, 8 January)
• Re: Rethinking @src in the context of chaining rules (Monday, 7 January)
• Re: Rethinking @src in the context of chaining rules (Monday, 7 January)
• Re: Rethinking @src in the context of chaining rules (Monday, 7 January)
• Re: thoughts on @resource in current RDFa Syntax draft (Monday, 7 January)
• Re: RDFa Basics video on YouTube (Monday, 7 January)
• last stretch for Syntax Doc -- please make time to review *now*! (Thursday, 3 January)
• Telecon in a few hours - 1600 UTC Thursday (Thursday, 3 January)
• running tests locally (Wednesday, 2 January)
• thoughts on @resource in current RDFa Syntax draft (Wednesday, 2 January)

Benjamin Nowack

• Re: JSON representation of semantic objects (Friday, 4 January)

Bob DuCharme

• RDFa in flickr? (Saturday, 5 January)

Dan Brickley

• Re: finding closure on the issues (Monday, 21 January)
• Re: RDFa for HTML imagemap accessibility and clipart? (Monday, 7 January)
• RDFa for HTML imagemap accessibility and clipart? (Sunday, 6 January)

Diego Berrueta

• review of current draft of 'RDFa syntax' (Tuesday, 29 January)

Guus Schreiber

• Re: New RDFa Syntax Draft ready for reviews (Friday, 25 January)

Hausenblas, Michael

• [Eurostat dataset] riese = linked data + RDFa (Thursday, 31 January)
• RE: librdfa - a pure C RDFa parser (Thursday, 31 January)
• RE: Section 1 of the New RDFa Syntax Draft ready for reviews (Tuesday, 29 January)
• RE: Section 1 of the New RDFa Syntax Draft ready for reviews (Monday, 28 January)
• [RDFa TC] Updates (Sunday, 27 January)
• [RDFa] Meeting record: 2008-01-17 telecon (Friday, 18 January)
• RE: Telecon Thursday, 1600 UTC (Thursday, 10 January)
• RE: Test Cases for 2008-01-10 telecon (Thursday, 10 January)
• RE: Do the following examples generate any triples? (Wednesday, 9 January)
• RE: Rethinking @src in the context of chaining rules (Wednesday, 9 January)
• [RDFa TC] Update regarding TC 19 and TC 71/72 (Monday, 7 January)
• RE: RDFa Basics video on YouTube (Monday, 7 January)
• RE: RDFa for HTML imagemap accessibility and clipart? (Monday, 7 January)
• RE: RDFa in flickr? (Saturday, 5 January)
• AW: Telecon in a few hours - 1600 UTC Thursday (Thursday, 3 January)

Ivan Herman

• Re: comment on the syntax document: discrepancies between tests and the latest version... (Thursday, 31 January)
• comment on the syntax document: discrepancies between tests and the latest version... (Thursday, 31 January)
• Re: librdfa - a pure C RDFa parser (Thursday, 31 January)
• Re: Section 1 of the New RDFa Syntax Draft ready for reviews (Tuesday, 29 January)
• Re: Section 1 of the New RDFa Syntax Draft ready for reviews (Tuesday, 29 January)
• Re: Section 1 of the New RDFa Syntax Draft ready for reviews (Tuesday, 29 January)
• Re: Section 1 of the New RDFa Syntax Draft ready for reviews (Tuesday, 29 January)
• Re: Section 1 of the New RDFa Syntax Draft ready for reviews (Monday, 28 January)
• Re: Section 1 of the New RDFa Syntax Draft ready for reviews (Monday, 28 January)
• Re: Test Case #77: @rev reserved values in XHTML (Friday, 25 January)
• Re: meeting record: 2008-01-24 RDFa Task Force (Friday, 25 January)
• Re: Further changes to URI and CURIE processing description (Thursday, 24 January)
• Re: Comments on the latest version of the syntax document (Thursday, 24 January)
• Re: Further changes to URI and CURIE processing description (Thursday, 24 January)
• Comments on the latest version of the syntax document (Thursday, 24 January)
• Re: Further changes to URI and CURIE processing description (Thursday, 24 January)
• Re: capturing reserved keywords in @rel (Wednesday, 23 January)
• Re: Thoughts on @href/@resource completing hanging @rels (Wednesday, 23 January)
• Re: capturing reserved keywords in @rel (Tuesday, 22 January)
• Re: Thoughts on @href/@resource completing hanging @rels (Tuesday, 22 January)
• Re: capturing reserved keywords in @rel (Tuesday, 22 January)
• Re: Thoughts on @href/@resource completing hanging @rels (Tuesday, 22 January)
• Re: capturing reserved keywords in @rel (Tuesday, 22 January)
• Re: FYI: another usage proposal for RDFa (Friday, 18 January)
• FYI: another usage proposal for RDFa (Friday, 18 January)
• Re: Ivan's famous... (Thursday, 17 January)
• Re: Proposal for addressing non-prefixed values in @rel/@rev (Wednesday, 16 January)
• Re: status of non-prefixed values in @rel (Wednesday, 16 January)
• Re: status of non-prefixed values in @rel (Wednesday, 16 January)
• Re: annotate same data with different vocabularies (Thursday, 10 January)
• Re: annotate same data with different vocabularies (Thursday, 10 January)
• Re: Summary of @href/@resource completing triples issue (v2.0) (Thursday, 10 January)
• Re: Summary of @href/@resource completing triples issue (v2.0) (Thursday, 10 January)
• Re: Test Cases for 2008-01-10 telecon (Thursday, 10 January)
• Re: Summary of @href/@resource completing triples issue (v2.0) (Thursday, 10 January)
• Re: Least-damage approach to @href/@resource completing triples (Thursday, 10 January)
• Re: Test Cases for 2008-01-10 telecon (Thursday, 10 January)
• Re: Summary of @href/@resource completing triples issue (v2.0) (Thursday, 10 January)
• Re: RDFa attributes on the html element (Wednesday, 9 January)
• Re: Do the following examples generate any triples? (Wednesday, 9 January)
• Re: Do the following examples generate any triples? (Wednesday, 9 January)
• Re: Do the following examples generate any triples? (Wednesday, 9 January)
• Re: Rethinking @src in the context of chaining rules (Wednesday, 9 January)
• Re: Do the following examples generate any triples? (Wednesday, 9 January)
• Re: Does @resource/@href complete hanging rels? (was Rethinking @src in the context of chaining rules) (Wednesday, 9 January)
• Re: Rethinking @src in the context of chaining rules (Wednesday, 9 January)
• Re: Rethinking @src in the context of chaining rules (Tuesday, 8 January)
• Re: [foaf-dev] Re: RDFa for HTML imagemap accessibility and clipart? (Tuesday, 8 January)
• Re: RDFa Basics video on YouTube (Tuesday, 8 January)
• Re: RDFa for HTML imagemap accessibility and clipart? (Monday, 7 January)
• Re: RDFa for HTML imagemap accessibility and clipart? (Monday, 7 January)
• Re: RDFa for HTML imagemap accessibility and clipart? (Monday, 7 January)
• Re: thoughts on @resource in current RDFa Syntax draft (Monday, 7 January)
• Re: Updated editor's draft (Monday, 7 January)
• Re: Updated editor's draft (Friday, 4 January)
• Re: thoughts on @resource in current RDFa Syntax draft (Thursday, 3 January)
• Re: Test Case #73: @about with relative URL using XHTML @xml:base (Thursday, 3 January)

Jeremy Carroll

• comment on http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-rdfa-syntax-20071018 (Tuesday, 29 January)

Karl Dubost

• Trackback in RDFa (Wednesday, 23 January)
• Re: RDFa in flickr? (Monday, 7 January)

Laurian Gridinoc

• Re: having triples, how to annotate terms in page? (Wednesday, 23 January)
• having triples, how to annotate terms in page? (Wednesday, 23 January)

Manu Sporny

• librdfa - a pure C RDFa parser (Thursday, 31 January)
• Re: Test Case #77: @rev reserved values in XHTML (Friday, 25 January)
• meeting record: 2008-01-24 RDFa Task Force (Thursday, 24 January)
• Test Case #77: @rev reserved values in XHTML (Wednesday, 23 January)
• Test Case #76: @rel reserved values in XHTML (Wednesday, 23 January)
• Re: Exact wording for non-prefixed CURIEs in @rel/@rev (Tuesday, 22 January)
• Re: Exact wording for non-prefixed CURIEs in @rel/@rev (Tuesday, 22 January)
• Re: Exact wording for non-prefixed CURIEs in @rel/@rev (Tuesday, 22 January)
• Re: Exact wording for non-prefixed CURIEs in @rel/@rev (Tuesday, 22 January)
• Re: capturing reserved keywords in @rel (Tuesday, 22 January)
• Exact wording for non-prefixed CURIEs in @rel/@rev (Tuesday, 22 January)
• Re: capturing reserved keywords in @rel (Tuesday, 22 January)
• Re: Does @instanceof apply to @href? (Tuesday, 22 January)
• Does @instanceof apply to @href? (was: finding closure on the issues) (Monday, 21 January)
• Re: Thoughts on @href/@resource completing hanging @rels (Monday, 21 January)
• Thoughts on @src becoming equivalent to @about (Monday, 21 January)
• Thoughts on @href/@resource completing hanging @rels (Monday, 21 January)
• Re: telecon (Thursday, 17 January)
• Ivan's famous... (Wednesday, 16 January)
• Proposal for addressing non-prefixed values in @rel/@rev (Wednesday, 16 January)
• Re: status of non-prefixed values in @rel (Wednesday, 16 January)
• Re: status of non-prefixed values in @rel (Tuesday, 15 January)
• Re: Summary of @href/@resource completing triples issue (v2.0) (Thursday, 10 January)
• Least-damage approach to @href/@resource completing triples (Thursday, 10 January)
• Test Cases for 2008-01-10 telecon (Thursday, 10 January)
• Test Case #76: using new XHTML+RDFa reserved word in BODY using @rel, no @about (Wednesday, 9 January)
• Test Case #75: @href with relative URL using XHTML BASE in HEAD (Wednesday, 9 January)
• Test Case #74: @resource with relative URL using XHTML BASE in HEAD (Wednesday, 9 January)
• Summary of @href/@resource completing triples issue (v2.0) (Wednesday, 9 January)
• Summary of @href/@resource completing triples issue (Wednesday, 9 January)
• Do the following examples generate any triples? (Tuesday, 8 January)
• Re: Rethinking @src in the context of chaining rules (Tuesday, 8 January)
• Does @resource/@href complete hanging rels? (was Rethinking @src in the context of chaining rules) (Tuesday, 8 January)
• Re: Rethinking @src in the context of chaining rules (Tuesday, 8 January)
• Re: RDFa Basics video on YouTube (Monday, 7 January)
• Re: RDFa Basics video on YouTube (Monday, 7 January)
• RDFa Basics video on YouTube (Monday, 7 January)
• High-level comments on RDFa Syntax Document (Saturday, 5 January)
• Re: JSON representation of semantic objects (Saturday, 5 January)
• JSON representation of semantic objects (Friday, 4 January)
• Re: pyRdfa updated (Thursday, 3 January)
• Re: Test Case #73: @about with relative URL using XHTML @xml:base (Thursday, 3 January)
• Test Case #73: @about with relative URL using XHTML @xml:base (Thursday, 3 January)
• Test Case #72: @about with relative URL using XHTML BASE in HEAD (Thursday, 3 January)
• Test Case #71: triple generation in body without @about or @instanceof (Thursday, 3 January)

Mark Birbeck

• Re: comment on the syntax document: discrepancies between tests and the latest version... (Thursday, 31 January)
• Re: comment on the syntax document: discrepancies between tests and the latest version... (Thursday, 31 January)
• Re: librdfa - a pure C RDFa parser (Thursday, 31 January)
• Re: review of current draft of 'RDFa syntax' (Tuesday, 29 January)
• Re: comment on http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-rdfa-syntax-20071018 (Tuesday, 29 January)
• Re: Section 1 of the New RDFa Syntax Draft ready for reviews (Tuesday, 29 January)
• Re: Section 1 of the New RDFa Syntax Draft ready for reviews (Tuesday, 29 January)
• Re: Section 1 of the New RDFa Syntax Draft ready for reviews (Tuesday, 29 January)
• New editors' draft of the XHTML+RDFa syntax document is available (Friday, 25 January)
• Re: Comments on the latest version of the syntax document (Thursday, 24 January)
• Re: Further changes to URI and CURIE processing description (Thursday, 24 January)
• Re: Comments on the latest version of the syntax document (Thursday, 24 January)
• Re: Further changes to URI and CURIE processing description (Thursday, 24 January)
• Further updates and outstanding issues (Wednesday, 23 January)
• Further changes to URI and CURIE processing description (Wednesday, 23 January)
• Re: having triples, how to annotate terms in page? (Wednesday, 23 January)
• Re: Updated Editor's Draft (Wednesday, 23 January)
• Changes to syntax document for @rel and @rev (Wednesday, 23 January)
• Re: Exact wording for non-prefixed CURIEs in @rel/@rev (Tuesday, 22 January)
• Re: Exact wording for non-prefixed CURIEs in @rel/@rev (Tuesday, 22 January)
• Re: Exact wording for non-prefixed CURIEs in @rel/@rev (Tuesday, 22 January)
• Re: Exact wording for non-prefixed CURIEs in @rel/@rev (Tuesday, 22 January)
• Re: Exact wording for non-prefixed CURIEs in @rel/@rev (Tuesday, 22 January)
• Re: Exact wording for non-prefixed CURIEs in @rel/@rev (Tuesday, 22 January)
• Re: capturing reserved keywords in @rel (Tuesday, 22 January)
• Re: Thoughts on @href/@resource completing hanging @rels (Tuesday, 22 January)
• Re: capturing reserved keywords in @rel (Tuesday, 22 January)
• Re: Thoughts on @href/@resource completing hanging @rels (Tuesday, 22 January)
• Re: capturing reserved keywords in @rel (Tuesday, 22 January)
• Re: Does @instanceof apply to @href? (Tuesday, 22 January)
• Re: Does @instanceof apply to @href? (Tuesday, 22 January)
• Re: capturing reserved keywords in @rel (Tuesday, 22 January)
• Re: capturing reserved keywords in @rel (Tuesday, 22 January)
• Re: Thoughts on @href/@resource completing hanging @rels (Tuesday, 22 January)
• Re: Does @instanceof apply to @href? (Tuesday, 22 January)
• Re: Thoughts on @src becoming equivalent to @about (Tuesday, 22 January)
• Re: finding closure on the issues (Tuesday, 22 January)
• Re: finding closure on the issues (Monday, 21 January)
• Re: FYI: another usage proposal for RDFa (Friday, 18 January)
• Re: status of non-prefixed values in @rel (Friday, 18 January)
• Re: FYI: another usage proposal for RDFa (Friday, 18 January)
• Re: running tests locally (Thursday, 17 January)
• Re: status of non-prefixed values in @rel (Wednesday, 16 January)
• Re: status of non-prefixed values in @rel (Tuesday, 15 January)
• Re: status of non-prefixed values in @rel (Tuesday, 15 January)
• Re: Summary of @href/@resource completing triples issue (v2.0) (Thursday, 10 January)
• Re: Summary of @href/@resource completing triples issue (v2.0) (Thursday, 10 January)
• Re: Summary of @href/@resource completing triples issue (v2.0) (Thursday, 10 January)
• Re: Summary of @href/@resource completing triples issue (v2.0) (Thursday, 10 January)
• Re: Summary of @href/@resource completing triples issue (v2.0) (Thursday, 10 January)
• Re: Summary of @href/@resource completing triples issue (v2.0) (Thursday, 10 January)
• Re: Test Cases for 2008-01-10 telecon (Thursday, 10 January)
• Re: Summary of @href/@resource completing triples issue (Wednesday, 9 January)
• Re: Summary of @href/@resource completing triples issue (v2.0) (Wednesday, 9 January)
• Re: Do the following examples generate any triples? (Wednesday, 9 January)
• Re: Do the following examples generate any triples? (Wednesday, 9 January)
• Re: Do the following examples generate any triples? (Wednesday, 9 January)
• Re: Do the following examples generate any triples? (Wednesday, 9 January)
• Re: Rethinking @src in the context of chaining rules (Tuesday, 8 January)
• Re: Rethinking @src in the context of chaining rules (Tuesday, 8 January)
• Re: Rethinking @src in the context of chaining rules (Tuesday, 8 January)
• Re: Rethinking @src in the context of chaining rules (Tuesday, 8 January)
• Re: Rethinking @src in the context of chaining rules (Monday, 7 January)
• Re: Rethinking @src in the context of chaining rules (Monday, 7 January)
• Re: Rethinking @src in the context of chaining rules (Monday, 7 January)
• Re: Rethinking @src in the context of chaining rules (Monday, 7 January)
• Re: running tests locally (Sunday, 6 January)
• Re: thoughts on @resource in current RDFa Syntax draft (Sunday, 6 January)
• Re: High-level comments on RDFa Syntax Document (Sunday, 6 January)
• Re: Updated editor's draft (Sunday, 6 January)
• Re: thoughts on @resource in current RDFa Syntax draft (Thursday, 3 January)
• Apologies for this week's telecons (Wednesday, 2 January)

Meri Kovach

• annotate same data with different vocabularies (Thursday, 10 January)

Michael Bolger

• Re: Section 1 of the New RDFa Syntax Draft ready for reviews (Monday, 28 January)
• Section 1 of the New RDFa Syntax Draft ready for reviews (Sunday, 27 January)

Mikael Nilsson

• Re: capturing reserved keywords in @rel (Wednesday, 23 January)

Nathan Yergler

• Re: running tests locally (Thursday, 3 January)

Niklas Lindström

• Re: Summary of @href/@resource completing triples issue (v2.0) (Friday, 11 January)
• Re: Summary of @href/@resource completing triples issue (Thursday, 10 January)
• Re: Describing documents and their parts (Wednesday, 9 January)
• Describing documents and their parts (Wednesday, 9 January)
• Re: Rethinking @src in the context of chaining rules (Tuesday, 8 January)
• Re: Rethinking @src in the context of chaining rules (Tuesday, 8 January)
• Re: RDFa for HTML imagemap accessibility and clipart? (Sunday, 6 January)

Peter Krantz

• Re: Section 1 of the New RDFa Syntax Draft ready for reviews (Monday, 28 January)

Ralph R. Swick

• meeting record: 2007-01-31 RDFa telecon (Thursday, 31 January)
• meeting record: 2008-01-03 RDFa telecon (Thursday, 3 January)

Shane McCarron

• Re: Section 1 of the New RDFa Syntax Draft ready for reviews (Monday, 28 January)
• Re: New editors' draft of the XHTML+RDFa syntax document is available (Friday, 25 January)
• Re: Further updates and outstanding issues (Thursday, 24 January)
• Re: Further changes to URI and CURIE processing description (Wednesday, 23 January)
• Updated Editor's Draft (Wednesday, 23 January)
• Re: Exact wording for non-prefixed CURIEs in @rel/@rev (Tuesday, 22 January)
• Re: Exact wording for non-prefixed CURIEs in @rel/@rev (Tuesday, 22 January)
• Re: Exact wording for non-prefixed CURIEs in @rel/@rev (Tuesday, 22 January)
• Re: Exact wording for non-prefixed CURIEs in @rel/@rev (Tuesday, 22 January)
• Re: Exact wording for non-prefixed CURIEs in @rel/@rev (Tuesday, 22 January)
• Re: capturing reserved keywords in @rel (Tuesday, 22 January)
• Re: capturing reserved keywords in @rel (Tuesday, 22 January)
• Re: capturing reserved keywords in @rel (Tuesday, 22 January)
• Re: capturing reserved keywords in @rel (Monday, 21 January)
• Re: status of non-prefixed values in @rel (Wednesday, 16 January)
• Re: status of non-prefixed values in @rel (Wednesday, 16 January)
• Re: status of non-prefixed values in @rel (Wednesday, 16 January)
• Re: status of non-prefixed values in @rel (Wednesday, 16 January)
• Re: Summary of @href/@resource completing triples issue (v2.0) (Thursday, 10 January)
• RDFa attributes on the html element (Wednesday, 9 January)
• Re: Do the following examples generate any triples? (Wednesday, 9 January)
• Re: Do the following examples generate any triples? (Wednesday, 9 January)
• Updated editor's draft (Thursday, 3 January)
• Re: Telecon in a few hours - 1600 UTC Thursday (Thursday, 3 January)
• Re: Test Case #73: @about with relative URL using XHTML @xml:base (Thursday, 3 January)

Simone Onofri

• Re: Trackback in RDFa (Wednesday, 23 January)
• Re: RDFa for HTML imagemap accessibility and clipart? (Tuesday, 8 January)
• Re: RDFa Basics video on YouTube (Tuesday, 8 January)
• Re: Telecon in a few hours - 1600 UTC Thursday (Thursday, 3 January)

Steven Pemberton

• Re: status of non-prefixed values in @rel (Thursday, 17 January)

Last message date: Thursday, 31 January 2008 17:17:20 UTC