W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org > January 2008

Re: Exact wording for non-prefixed CURIEs in @rel/@rev

From: Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 13:34:40 -0800
Message-ID: <47966170.4040002@adida.net>
To: Mark Birbeck <mark.birbeck@formsPlayer.com>
CC: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, RDFa <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>

Mark Birbeck wrote:
> How about that? We simply modify the introductory part of the CURIE
> section to say that unprefixed CURIEs are ignored (which we have
> already, but it's not published) and then in some other suitable spot
> we just say that "license" => "xh:license", "next" => "xh:next", and
> so on.

I like this, it maps nicely to how most parsers will be written without
making a big stink about pre-processing like I was doing :)

> And we might as well change the empty prefix from XHTML-vocab (since
> no-one needs to write ":next" anymore) to the current default mapping.

Sounds good to me, too.

Received on Tuesday, 22 January 2008 21:35:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:50:26 UTC