W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org > January 2008

Re: status of non-prefixed values in @rel

From: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 11:26:57 -0600
Message-ID: <478E3E61.3040605@aptest.com>
To: Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>
CC: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, Mark Birbeck <mark.birbeck@formsPlayer.com>, RDFa <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>

Ben Adida wrote:
> Certainly, in the RDFa spec, we should "outsource" the definition of the
> reserved words to the XHTML spec.
But this document (rdfa-syntax) IS the XHTML spec.  It contains the 
module definition.  I mean, we can pull that back out into a separate 
document if you want.  That's just editorial.  But if we do, it makes 
the whole thing harder to read and understand in my opinion.  It also 
makes us and our language (XHTML+RDFa) dependent upon another, external 
REC track document that we would then have to be in lock step with on 
our way to publication. 

Shane P. McCarron                          Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120
Managing Director                            Fax: +1 763 786-8180
ApTest Minnesota                            Inet: shane@aptest.com
Received on Wednesday, 16 January 2008 17:27:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:50:26 UTC