Shane McCarron wrote: > I have stayed silent through this whole debate 'cause I am basically not > qualified to debate how many angels can dance on the head of this > particular pin. However, one thing you said here, Ivan, I felt I needed > to correct / expand upon: > > Ivan Herman wrote: >> (Note that this may be considered as a mild edge case, too: after all, >> @href can appear on <a> only in XHTML1) > Well - regardless of what is permitted in XHTML1, by which I assume you > mean XHTML 1.0, in XHTML + RDFa @href is allowed everywhere, more or > less. So as we think about triple generation, we need to keep that in > mind. > Really? I thought we decided that would not be the case some point in the past (I remember long debates about this) when we introduced @resource. The logic being to minimize the differences between XHTML1.0 and XHTML+RDFa to what is strictly necessary. But I may be wrong. > I now return you to your regularly scheduled technical debate. > :-) Ivan -- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 January 2008 12:39:31 GMT