W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org > January 2008

comment on the syntax document: discrepancies between tests and the latest version...

From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 11:49:14 +0100
Message-ID: <47A1A7AA.1010003@w3.org>
To: Mark Birbeck <mark.birbeck@x-port.net>
CC: W3C RDFa task force <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>, "Hausenblas, Michael" <michael.hausenblas@joanneum.at>
I try to run my newest version of tests against crazy ivan, and I get 
four failed tests. As far as I can see, all four are based on some 
discrepancies between the syntax document and the test suite (or I 
misunderstood something). Here they are:

Tests #34 (and #38 which is more or less the same)
--------------------------------------------------

In Test #34 we have

<img 	about="http://sw-app.org/mic.xhtml#i"
   	   		rel="foaf:img"
   	   		src="http://sw-app.org/img/mic_2007_01.jpg"
   	   		alt="A photo depicting Michael" />

			
and the requested triple is

<http://sw-app.org/mic.xhtml#i> <http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/img> 
<http://sw-app.org/img/mic_2007_01.jpg>

The current syntax document, however, uses @src as setting the subject, 
not the object. I know this was one of our evergreen discussion... what 
is it now?
			
Test #63
--------

What is the latest agreement on what the value of ":next" should be? It 
is not clear (to me) in the text. The test suggests that ":next" should 
be in the xhtml vocab space, but my fear is that this may be a previous 
version of our status (ie, the test should be changed)

My understanding is that ":next" has an empty prefix, which should be 
the base URI...

Test #66:
---------

  <head instanceof="foaf:Document">
       <title>Test 0066</title>
    </head>
    <body>
       <p>This is test #66.</p>
    </body>

The test suggests that

<http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/testsuite/xhtml1-testcases/0066.xhtml> 
<http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type> 
<http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/Document>

ie, there is an implicit extra about on the <head>. I know we discussed 
this, we more or less agreed on that, but it is not on the syntax 
document as far as I can see...


-- 

Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf


Received on Thursday, 31 January 2008 10:49:26 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 31 January 2008 10:49:26 GMT