- From: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 11:53:56 -0600
- To: Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>
- CC: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, RDFa <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
And I disagree - the normative definition of the reserved values cannot be outside of the module definition. And this IS the module definition for XHTML Modularization 1.0/1.1. There can and must be a file at the vocab URI that contains annotated RDFa to define those values too, but that cannot be normative. Ben Adida wrote: > Manu Sporny wrote: > >> Don't we more-or-less have that in #3 of this e-mail sent to the list: >> >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Jan/0152.html >> > > I agree. This is more or less what we should have in the spec. > > -Ben > -- Shane P. McCarron Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120 Managing Director Fax: +1 763 786-8180 ApTest Minnesota Inet: shane@aptest.com
Received on Tuesday, 22 January 2008 17:54:33 UTC