W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org > January 2008

RE: Do the following examples generate any triples?

From: Hausenblas, Michael <michael.hausenblas@joanneum.at>
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 14:02:52 +0100
Message-ID: <768DACDC356ED04EA1F1130F97D298520144A4AE@RZJC2EX.jr1.local>
To: "Shane McCarron" <shane@aptest.com>, "Ivan Herman" <ivan@w3.org>
Cc: "Mark Birbeck" <mark.birbeck@formsPlayer.com>, "Manu Sporny" <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, "RDFa" <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>

Can be found as usual at
(direct link: http://www.w3.org/2007/07/19-rdfa-minutes.html#item02).

This is, btw, a great opportunity to remind people: 
whenever we have a resolution, please add it to this Wiki page ;)


 Michael Hausenblas, MSc.
 Institute of Information Systems & Information Management
 JOANNEUM RESEARCH Forschungsgesellschaft mbH

>-----Original Message-----
>From: public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf-request@w3.org 
>[mailto:public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of 
>Shane McCarron
>Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2008 1:56 PM
>To: Ivan Herman
>Cc: Mark Birbeck; Manu Sporny; RDFa
>Subject: Re: Do the following examples generate any triples?
>XHTML-RDFa is based upon XHTML 1.1, not 1.0.  And the group 
>resolved to 
>permit @href everywhere because it enabled many use cases and didn't 
>break anything.  Ben or Ralph can no doubt cite the resolution.
>Ivan Herman wrote:
>> Shane McCarron wrote:
>>> I have stayed silent through this whole debate 'cause I am 
>>> not qualified to debate how many angels can dance on the 
>head of this 
>>> particular pin.  However, one thing you said here, Ivan, I felt I 
>>> needed to correct / expand upon:
>>> Ivan Herman wrote:
>>>> (Note that this may be considered as a mild edge case, too: after 
>>>> all, @href can appear on <a> only in XHTML1)
>>> Well - regardless of what is permitted in XHTML1, by which I assume 
>>> you mean XHTML 1.0, in XHTML + RDFa @href is allowed 
>everywhere, more 
>>> or less.  So as we think about triple generation, we need to keep 
>>> that in mind.
>> Really? I thought we decided that would not be the case some 
>point in 
>> the past (I remember long debates about this) when we introduced 
>> @resource. The logic being to minimize the differences between 
>> XHTML1.0 and XHTML+RDFa to what is strictly necessary. But I may be 
>> wrong.
>>> I now return you to your regularly scheduled technical debate.
>> :-)
>> Ivan
>Shane P. McCarron                          Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120
>Managing Director                            Fax: +1 763 786-8180
>ApTest Minnesota                            Inet: shane@aptest.com
Received on Wednesday, 9 January 2008 13:03:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:50:26 UTC