Hi Ivan, On 22/01/2008, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote: > Well... so it seems that the model is a bit more complex than I > thought:-( Indeed, this 'shift' stuff comes into the picture, too. Sigh. I'm not sure what you mean though...I think it's about as simple as you could get. > Only one remarks below. Other than that, I guess back to square one: the > group has to vote... (and implementers like me have to execute:-) Yes, a vote would be good. And yes, I have to execute too, just as soon as I get through working on the spec. > > No. In this case, applying the grid above, you would get: > > > > _:a a:b <#a> . > > > > I.e., both @resource and @href shift to the right in the presence of > > @rel, and then according to our list, @resource takes priority. > > > > And here I am lost. Even in your model, isn't the right triple: > > > <INHERITEDSUBJECT> a:b <#a>. > > where <INHERITEDSUBJECT> is either <> (provided @about="" is implicitly > on <body> or <html>) or some inherited resource? Where does this sudden > blank node come from? It doesn't...my apologies. I've spent too long looking at examples with @instanceof in (for the other discussions) that I'm seeing them everywhere. You are right, and there would be no blank node. Regards, Mark -- Mark Birbeck, formsPlayer mark.birbeck@formsPlayer.com | +44 (0) 20 7689 9232 http://www.formsPlayer.com | http://internet-apps.blogspot.com standards. innovation.Received on Tuesday, 22 January 2008 15:22:49 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 22 January 2008 15:22:50 GMT