W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org > January 2008

Re: Thoughts on @href/@resource completing hanging @rels

From: Mark Birbeck <mark.birbeck@formsPlayer.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 15:22:32 +0000
Message-ID: <a707f8300801220722i6f47a96ck413277f77ae98f8b@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Ivan Herman" <ivan@w3.org>
Cc: "Manu Sporny" <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, "RDFa mailing list" <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>, "Ben Adida" <ben@adida.net>

Hi Ivan,

On 22/01/2008, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote:
> Well... so it seems that the model is a bit more complex than I
> thought:-( Indeed, this 'shift' stuff comes into the picture, too. Sigh.

I'm not sure what you mean though...I think it's about as simple as
you could get.

> Only one remarks below. Other than that, I guess back to square one: the
> group has to vote... (and implementers like me have to execute:-)

Yes, a vote would be good. And yes, I have to execute too, just as
soon as I get through working on the spec.

> > No. In this case, applying the grid above, you would get:
> >
> >   _:a a:b <#a> .
> >
> > I.e., both @resource and @href shift to the right in the presence of
> > @rel, and then according to our list, @resource takes priority.
> >
> And here I am lost. Even in your model, isn't the right triple:
> where <INHERITEDSUBJECT> is either <> (provided @about="" is implicitly
> on <body> or <html>) or some inherited resource? Where does this sudden
> blank node come from?

It doesn't...my apologies. I've spent too long looking at examples
with @instanceof in (for the other discussions) that I'm seeing them

You are right, and there would be no blank node.



  Mark Birbeck, formsPlayer

  mark.birbeck@formsPlayer.com | +44 (0) 20 7689 9232
  http://www.formsPlayer.com | http://internet-apps.blogspot.com

  standards. innovation.
Received on Tuesday, 22 January 2008 15:22:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:50:26 UTC