Re: Exact wording for non-prefixed CURIEs in @rel/@rev

Hi Shane,

Ah...that's good. :)

(Not that it matters in this forum, but do you think anyone actually
uses it like that?)

Regards,

Mark

On 22/01/2008, Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com> wrote:
>
>
> Mark Birbeck wrote:
> > (And there is an annoying aspect of XHTML and HTML which is that
> > 'alternate' is a modifer; in my parser I simply concatenate things
> > like 'alternate' and 'stylesheet' before turning them into CURIEs, so
> > that I get just one value, but someone may have a better proposal.)
> >
> rdfa-xhtml, which contains the Metainformation Attributes Module
> definition for XHTML+RDFa, does not permit the "alternate" modifier
> convention from HTML4.  I appreciate that you might want to deal with it
> in a generic implementation that worked on non-XHTML+RDFa documents -
> but in our documents rel="alternate stylesheet" wouldn't have special
> meaning.  It would have the meanings "alternate" and "stylesheet".
>
> --
> Shane P. McCarron                          Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120
> Managing Director                            Fax: +1 763 786-8180
> ApTest Minnesota                            Inet: shane@aptest.com
>
>
>


-- 
  Mark Birbeck, formsPlayer

  mark.birbeck@formsPlayer.com | +44 (0) 20 7689 9232
  http://www.formsPlayer.com | http://internet-apps.blogspot.com

  standards. innovation.