- From: Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>
- Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 10:39:20 -0800
- To: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- CC: Mark Birbeck <mark.birbeck@x-port.net>, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, RDFa <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
Shane McCarron wrote: > > huh? What does "no resolution" mean? It means they're ignored. I'm having a lot of trouble understanding what the problem is with ignoring values. We, including Mark, were willing to ignore prefix-less values in @class a few months ago. What's different about this here? In the proposal we *almost* agreed to (but didn't, and that's a good thing because I think it would be a deal-breaker for Creative Commons), Mark said the following: "We could certainly say that at this time we don't know how to deal with legacy values, and for now these values are completely ignored." [1] If it was doable then, why can't it be done now? Then, all we'd need is a pre-processing step that adds the prefix for a set of reserved values, and we're done. What's so hard about ignoring? -Ben [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2007Oct/0187
Received on Tuesday, 22 January 2008 18:39:39 UTC