Re: status of non-prefixed values in @rel

Mark,

Thanks for the details.

Instead of a long-winded response, I have one simple question: since
your proposal talked about deferring the issue until the next version of
RDFa, I assume that this means the current version of RDFa would
successfully ignore rel="foo", right?

If so, what's so hard about adding exceptions (e.g. pre-procesing) for
rel="next"? You say that "it's hard to ignore rel='foo'," but isn't that
what your proposal did?

-Ben