W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org > January 2008

Re: Section 1 of the New RDFa Syntax Draft ready for reviews

From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 18:11:10 +0100
Message-ID: <479F5E2E.8030808@w3.org>
To: Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>
CC: "Hausenblas, Michael" <michael.hausenblas@joanneum.at>, Michael Bolger <michael@michaelbolger.net>, RDFa <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>, peter.krantz@gmail.com
I agree, and my apologies if my reference to the note looked otherwise. 
We can write a Note, say, while the AC is voting on the Proposed rec of 
the current document, ie, when the group will have nothing else to do:-) 
The priority is the Rec!


Ben Adida wrote:
> Hausenblas, Michael wrote:
>> However, it *should* be permitted to contemplate
>> on possible future directions.
> I have no say in what is or isn't "permitted" of course!
> I'm only stating my opinion regarding the scope of our REC track
> package, making sure we don't add to our existing burden. Even an
> additional note within the REC track package could delay us significantly.
> -Ben


Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf

Received on Tuesday, 29 January 2008 17:11:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:50:26 UTC