W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org > January 2008

Re: Thoughts on @href/@resource completing hanging @rels

From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 16:13:41 +0100
Message-ID: <47960825.4020104@w3.org>
To: Mark Birbeck <mark.birbeck@formsPlayer.com>
Cc: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, RDFa mailing list <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>, Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>
Well... so it seems that the model is a bit more complex than I 
thought:-( Indeed, this 'shift' stuff comes into the picture, too. Sigh.

Only one remarks below. Other than that, I guess back to square one: the 
group has to vote... (and implementers like me have to execute:-)

Ivan

> 
>> That means that, for example
>>
>> <div resource="#a" rel="a:b" href="#c"/>
>>
>> yields
>>
>> <#a> a:b <#c>.
> 
> No. In this case, applying the grid above, you would get:
> 
>   _:a a:b <#a> .
> 
> I.e., both @resource and @href shift to the right in the presence of
> @rel, and then according to our list, @resource takes priority.
> 

And here I am lost. Even in your model, isn't the right triple:


<INHERITEDSUBJECT> a:b <#a>.

where <INHERITEDSUBJECT> is either <> (provided @about="" is implicitly 
on <body> or <html>) or some inherited resource? Where does this sudden 
blank node come from?

[snip]

-- 

Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf


Received on Tuesday, 22 January 2008 15:13:46 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 22 January 2008 15:13:48 GMT