- From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 17:18:14 -0500
- To: RDFa <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
Mark Birbeck wrote: >> [...] >> >> Thoughts? > > I think it could work. But I'm feeling that a more compact solution > would be possible, by simply removing unprefixed CURIEs altogether, > and then ensuring that valid unprefixed values get prefixed. > > How about that? Yes - that sounds great. > We simply modify the introductory part of the CURIE > section to say that unprefixed CURIEs are ignored (which we have > already, but it's not published) and then in some other suitable spot > we just say that "license" => "xh:license", "next" => "xh:next", and > so on. If you mean all "unprefixed CURIEs are ignored in all RDFa attributes", then agreed. I want to make sure that we are ignoring all unprefixed CURIEs in @property. This is to ensure consistency in the "unprefixed CURIEs are ignored" statement. > And we might as well change the empty prefix from XHTML-vocab (since > no-one needs to write ":next" anymore) to the current default mapping. Could you clarify? This sounds like the empty prefix could be set to whatever is defined by "xmlns"... at which point, I second Shane's "eeeewww". -- manu -- Manu Sporny President/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. blog: Intro to the Semantic Web in 6 minutes (video) http://blog.digitalbazaar.com/2007/12/26/semantic-web-intro
Received on Tuesday, 22 January 2008 22:18:28 UTC