Re: capturing reserved keywords in @rel

Ben Adida wrote:
> This is actually the solution I would prefer by a wide margin: to have a
>  no-prefix CURIE variant of CURIEs, where non-prefixed version have no
> resolution. That's clearly what we need to ensure proper processing of
> HTML, and it's quite easy to define.
>   
huh?  What does "no resolution" mean?  

-- 
Shane P. McCarron                          Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120
Managing Director                            Fax: +1 763 786-8180
ApTest Minnesota                            Inet: shane@aptest.com