public-grddl-wg@w3.org from February 2007 by author

Ben Adida

• Re: RDFa example with role attibute *IMPORTANT* (Friday, 16 February)
• Re: RDFa in Primer (Monday, 12 February)
• Re: RDFa example with role attibute *IMPORTANT* (Sunday, 11 February)
• Re: Best way to embed Semantic Data (Saturday, 10 February)
• Re: Best way to embed Semantic Data (Friday, 9 February)
• Re: Primer: Updated Query, RDFa example (Wednesday, 7 February)
• [RDFa] Relationship between RDFa and GRDDL (Tuesday, 6 February)
• Re: GRDDL Going to Last Call (Tuesday, 6 February)

Brian Suda

• Re: Primer review : grokXFN.xsl broken? (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Use-case Revisions. (Friday, 9 February)

Chimezie Ogbuji

• Re: Sending Docs to Rec? (Saturday, 24 February)
• RE: Sending Docs to Rec? (Saturday, 24 February)
• Minutes from 2007-02-21 WG Telecon (attached) (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Re: HL7 XML example - second attempt / revision (Wednesday, 21 February)
• HL7 XML example - second attempt / revision (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Re: Sets of related test cases (hg admin) (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Re: GRDDL-aware agents (Was Re: "GRDDL Agents" ...) (#issue-conformance-labels) (Tuesday, 20 February)
• Re: Some spec comments (to .xsl or not to .xsl?) (#issue-whichlangs, #issue-conformance-labels) (Tuesday, 20 February)
• Re: Some spec comments (to .xsl or not to .xsl?) (#issue-whichlangs, #issue-conformance-labels) (Tuesday, 20 February)
• Re: Some spec comments (to .xsl or not to .xsl?) (#issue-whichlangs, #issue-conformance-labels) (Tuesday, 20 February)
• Re: GRDDL-aware agents (Was Re: "GRDDL Agents" ...) (#issue-conformance-labels) (Tuesday, 20 February)
• Re: Some spec comments (to .xsl or not to .xsl?) (Tuesday, 20 February)
• Re: Regrets for GRDDL WG telecon (Tuesday, 13 February)
• Regrets for GRDDL WG telecon (Tuesday, 13 February)
• Re: Checked in HL7 use case (Monday, 12 February)
• Re: #grddlonrdf test-case: approve? (Sunday, 11 February)
• GRDDL.py patch (Saturday, 10 February)
• Re: testcase #grddlonrdf1 complete (Saturday, 10 February)
• GRDDL WG Minutes from 7 Feb 2007 (Thursday, 8 February)
• RE: GRDDL spec ready for release? (Tuesday, 6 February)
• Re: GRDDL spec ready for release? (Friday, 2 February)

Clark, John

• RE: GRDDL-aware GRDDL (Wednesday, 21 February)
• RE: Sets of related test cases (Tuesday, 20 February)
• RE: "GRDDL Agents" section, normative security text for review (# issue-conformance-labels) (Monday, 19 February)
• RE: Sets of related test cases (Friday, 16 February)
• Minutes for 2007-02-14 GRDDL WG meeting (Thursday, 15 February)
• Sets of related test cases (Thursday, 15 February)
• Spec review (Tuesday, 13 February)
• RE: Use Cases review (Monday, 12 February)
• Use Cases review (Wednesday, 7 February)

Dan Connolly

• Re: GRDDL end-game survey (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Re: HP review for LC (spec_lean normative extract) (Tuesday, 27 February)
• Re: GRDDL end-game survey (Tuesday, 27 February)
• Re: GRDDL end-game survey (Tuesday, 27 February)
• GRDDL for Metalink, anyone? (Tuesday, 27 February)
• Re: Sending Docs to Rec? (Sunday, 25 February)
• HTTP Profile draft not stable in the coming weeks/months (#issue-http-header-links) (Thursday, 22 February)
• Re: GRDDL-aware GRDDL (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Re: GRDDL WD comments (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Re: comment (always editorial) for GRDDL spec (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Re: GRDDL end-game survey (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Re: Sets of related test cases (hg admin) (Wednesday, 21 February)
• GRDDL end-game survey (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Re: GRDDL-aware agents (Was Re: "GRDDL Agents" ...) (#issue-conformance-labels) (Tuesday, 20 February)
• Re: Some spec comments (to .xsl or not to .xsl?) (#issue-whichlangs, #issue-conformance-labels) (Tuesday, 20 February)
• Re: GRDDL-aware agents (Was Re: "GRDDL Agents" ...) (#issue-conformance-labels) (Tuesday, 20 February)
• Re: Some spec comments (to .xsl or not to .xsl?) (#issue-whichlangs, #issue-conformance-labels) (Tuesday, 20 February)
• Re: GRDDL-aware agents (Was Re: "GRDDL Agents" ...) (#issue-conformance-labels) (Tuesday, 20 February)
• Re: Draft spec text for HTTP Headers (Tuesday, 20 February)
• Re: GRDDL-aware GRDDL (Tuesday, 20 February)
• agenda GRDDL WG weekly 21 Feb in progress (Tuesday, 20 February)
• Re: GRDDL-aware agents (Was Re: "GRDDL Agents" ...) (#issue-conformance-labels) (Tuesday, 20 February)
• Re: "GRDDL Agents" section, normative security text for review (# issue-conformance-labels) (Tuesday, 20 February)
• Re: Spec section 9 (GRDDL Vocabulary) (Tuesday, 20 February)
• Re: Some spec comments (defn transformation property etc.) (Monday, 19 February)
• Re: Some spec comments (to .xsl or not to .xsl?) (Monday, 19 February)
• Re: Action to respond to jjc (Monday, 19 February)
• Re: "GRDDL Agents" section, normative security text for review (# issue-conformance-labels) (Monday, 19 February)
• Re: "GRDDL Agents" section, normative security text for review (# issue-conformance-labels) (Monday, 19 February)
• Re: "GRDDL Agents" section, normative security text for review (# issue-conformance-labels) (Monday, 19 February)
• Re: "GRDDL Agents" section (#issue-whichlangs, #issue-output-formats) (Monday, 19 February)
• Re: Spec section 9 (GRDDL Vocabulary) (Monday, 19 February)
• Re: "GRDDL Agents" section, normative security text for review (# issue-conformance-labels) (Saturday, 17 February)
• grddl-client, grddl-tests hg repositories moved/upgraded (Saturday, 17 February)
• "GRDDL Agents" section, normative security text for review (# issue-conformance-labels) (Saturday, 17 February)
• Re: comments on spec (Friday, 16 February)
• Re: Sets of related test cases (Friday, 16 February)
• Re: GRDDL Labels (Thursday, 15 February)
• Re: Spec review (Tuesday, 13 February)
• RE: Use Cases review (Tuesday, 13 February)
• detailed security considerations (#issue-conformance-labels) (Tuesday, 13 February)
• Re: Comments on draft spec (Monday, 12 February)
• Re: Comments on draft spec (intro wordsmithing, ns rule bug) (Monday, 12 February)
• Re: Checked in HL7 use case (Monday, 12 February)
• Re: Spec review: suggested addition re. recursion (Monday, 12 February)
• Re: "application/xml" media type test for RDF source documents finished (Monday, 12 February)
• Re: Use Cases review (Monday, 12 February)
• Re: #grddlonrdf test-case: approve? (Monday, 12 February)
• Re: GRDDL.py patch (Saturday, 10 February)
• Re: FW: HTTP Header Use Case (Friday, 9 February)
• Re: multipleRepresentations test case (and the XHTML Family) (Friday, 9 February)
• GRDDL Link header design alternatives (#issue-http-header-links) (Friday, 9 February)
• take care with cross-posting [was: GRDDL Link header ...] (Friday, 9 February)
• Re: FW: HTTP Header Use Case (Wednesday, 7 February)
• Appendix: A GRDDL-aware Agent protocol trace (Wednesday, 7 February)
• Re: GRDDL spec ready for release? (informative mechanical rules) (Wednesday, 7 February)
• Re: GRDDL spec ready for release? (informative mechanical rules) (Wednesday, 7 February)
• Re: GRDDL spec ready for release? (Wednesday, 7 February)
• Re: HTTP Header Use Case (Tuesday, 6 February)
• Re: Draft spec text for HTTP Headers (Tuesday, 6 February)
• Re: HTTP Header Precedence (Tuesday, 6 February)
• RE: GRDDL spec ready for release? (Monday, 5 February)
• Re: Raptor (Redland) does GRDDL (Friday, 2 February)
• GRDDL spec ready for release? (Friday, 2 February)
• normative rules for the case of XSLT and RDF/XML [#issue-output-formats] (Friday, 2 February)
• Re: Faithful Infoset paragraph (Friday, 2 February)

Danny Ayers

• Regrets for 2007-02-28 (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Re: GRDDL-aware agents (Was Re: "GRDDL Agents" ...) (Tuesday, 20 February)
• Re: Some spec comments (to .xsl or not to .xsl?) (Tuesday, 20 February)
• Re: Primer review : grokXFN.xsl broken? (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: Primer review : grokXFN.xsl broken? (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Comments on Primer draft (NO-GO) (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Primer review : grokXFN.xsl broken? (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Comments on Use Cases draft (final part) (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Comments on Use Cases draft (1-5) (Tuesday, 13 February)
• Minor editorial : Use Case titles not consistent (Tuesday, 13 February)
• Re: Comments on draft spec (Monday, 12 February)
• Re: Comments on draft spec (intro wordsmithing, ns rule bug) (Monday, 12 February)
• Comments on draft spec (Sunday, 11 February)
• Spec review: suggested addition re. recursion (Sunday, 11 February)
• http-link-header in GRDDL (Thursday, 8 February)
• XMDP Profile for hCalendar (Friday, 2 February)
• Raptor (Redland) does GRDDL (Thursday, 1 February)

Fabien Gandon

• Apologies and regrets for 7th of March (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Re: Comments on Use Cases draft (final part) (Friday, 23 February)
• Re: Comments on Use Cases draft (final part) (Thursday, 22 February)
• Re: Comments on Use Cases draft (1-5) (Thursday, 22 February)
• Re: Minor editorial : Use Case titles not consistent (Thursday, 22 February)
• Re: Use Cases review (Thursday, 22 February)
• RDFa example in Primer (was Comments on Primer draft (NO-GO)). (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Re: RDFa example with role attibute *IMPORTANT* (Sunday, 11 February)
• Viewing RDFa in your examples. (Sunday, 11 February)
• RDFa example with role attibute (Sunday, 11 February)
• Re: Use-case Revisions. (Sunday, 11 February)
• Re: Use Cases review (Sunday, 11 February)

Graham Klyne

• Re: GRDDL and IETF: Need "HTTP Header Linking" (Thursday, 8 February)

Harry Halpin

• Re: Reviews for GRDDL Spec? (Tuesday, 27 February)
• Agenda for GRDDL WG Meeting Feb 28 2007 11:00 EST (Tuesday, 27 February)
• Reviews for GRDDL Spec? (Tuesday, 27 February)
• The Chair wants *you* to take the GRDDL end-game survey (Tuesday, 27 February)
• Re: Sending Docs to Rec? (Saturday, 24 February)
• Re: Sending Docs to Rec? (Saturday, 24 February)
• Re: GRDDL Going to Last Call: Relevance to SAWSDL (Thursday, 22 February)
• Re: GRDDL Going to Last Call: Relevance to SAWSDL (Thursday, 22 February)
• Sending Docs to Rec? (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Re: Comments on Primer draft (NO-GO) (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Schedule and IETF - Working Draft/Last Call status (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Test-cases as Rec-track Document (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Re: GRDDL end-game survey (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Re: "GRDDL Agents" section, normative security text for review (# issue-conformance-labels) (Monday, 19 February)
• Re: "GRDDL Agents" section, normative security text for review (# issue-conformance-labels) (Saturday, 17 February)
• Re: multipleRepresentations test case (and the XHTML Family) (Tuesday, 13 February)
• Agenda for GRDDL WG Meeting: Feb 14th 11:00 ET (Tuesday, 13 February)
• Re: Regrets for GRDDL WG telecon (Tuesday, 13 February)
• Re: Checked in HL7 use case (Monday, 12 February)
• Re: Checked in HL7 use case (Monday, 12 February)
• Re: RDFa in Primer (Monday, 12 February)
• RDFa in Primer (Monday, 12 February)
• Checked in HL7 use case (Monday, 12 February)
• "application/xml" media type test for RDF source documents finished (Monday, 12 February)
• Checked HTTP Header Use-Case into Scenario Gallery Document (Monday, 12 February)
• Take 2: GRDDL Minutes Feb 7th (Sunday, 11 February)
• GRDDL minutes Feb 7th (Sunday, 11 February)
• Re: http-link-header in GRDDL (Sunday, 11 February)
• #grddlonrdf test-case: approve? (Sunday, 11 February)
• testcase #grddlonrdf1 complete (Saturday, 10 February)
• langconneg test case done (Friday, 9 February)
• Re: Best way to embed Semantic Data (Friday, 9 February)
• Re: GRDDL Link header design alternatives (#issue-http-header-links) (Friday, 9 February)
• SemWeb Co-ordination Group advice on IETF and HTTP Headers in GRDDL (Friday, 9 February)
• Re: GRDDL Link header [was: SW Coordination Group Meeting agenda, 2007-02-08] (Friday, 9 February)
• Quick question re HTTP Header (Wednesday, 7 February)
• GRDDL and IETF: Need "HTTP Header Linking" (Wednesday, 7 February)
• Re: Primer: Updated Query, RDFa example (Wednesday, 7 February)
• Primer: Updated Query, RDFa example (Wednesday, 7 February)
• Fixing SPARQL Query in GRDDL Primer (Wednesday, 7 February)
• GRDDL Going to Last Call: Relevance to SAWSDL (Wednesday, 7 February)
• Re: GRDDL spec ready for release? (informative mechanical rules) (Wednesday, 7 February)
• Meeting Agenda for Feb 7th GRDDL WG Meeting 11:00ET (Tuesday, 6 February)
• Meeting Minutes for GRDDL WG Jan 31 Meeting (Tuesday, 6 February)
• Re: GRDDL spec ready for release? (Tuesday, 6 February)
• Solving #issue-http-header-links (Tuesday, 6 February)
• Re: GRDDL Going to Last Call (Tuesday, 6 February)
• Re: GRDDL Going to Last Call (Tuesday, 6 February)
• Re: GRDDL spec ready for release? (Friday, 2 February)

Ian Davis

• Today's call (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Regrets (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Primer version 1.43 (Monday, 19 February)
• Updated primer (Monday, 19 February)
• RE: Primer comments (Monday, 19 February)
• Action to respond to jjc (Monday, 19 February)
• RE: RDFa in Primer (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: FW: HTTP Header Use Case (Thursday, 8 February)
• Re: Quick question re HTTP Header (Wednesday, 7 February)
• RE: Primer comments (Wednesday, 7 February)
• RE: Primer: Updated Query, RDFa example (Wednesday, 7 February)
• RE: Fixing SPARQL Query in GRDDL Primer (Wednesday, 7 February)
• RE: GRDDL spec ready for release? (Tuesday, 6 February)
• Draft spec text for HTTP Headers (Tuesday, 6 February)
• HTTP Header Precedence (Tuesday, 6 February)
• HTTP Header Use Case (Tuesday, 6 February)

Ivan Herman

• Re: RDFa example with role attibute (Monday, 12 February)
• Re: RDFa example with role attibute (Monday, 12 February)

Jacek Kopecky

• Re: GRDDL Going to Last Call: Relevance to SAWSDL (Thursday, 22 February)

Jeremy Carroll

• Re: HP review for LC (spec_lean normative extract) (Wednesday, 28 February)
• HP review for LC (Tuesday, 27 February)
• Re: FW: HTTP Header Use Case (Friday, 9 February)
• Re: FW: HTTP Header Use Case (Thursday, 8 February)
• Re: FW: HTTP Header Use Case (Wednesday, 7 February)

McBride, Brian

• RE: Sending Docs to Rec? (Thursday, 22 February)
• RE: GRDDL WD comments (Thursday, 22 February)
• RE: Spec section 9 (GRDDL Vocabulary) (Tuesday, 20 February)
• RE: "GRDDL Agents" section, normative security text for review (# issue-conformance-labels) (Tuesday, 20 February)
• Some spec comments (Monday, 19 February)
• RE: httpHeaders test (Monday, 19 February)
• httpHeaders test (Monday, 19 February)
• RE: Spec section 9 (GRDDL Vocabulary) (Monday, 19 February)
• Spec section 9 (Monday, 19 February)
• RE: "GRDDL Agents" section, normative security text for review (# issue-conformance-labels) (Monday, 19 February)
• issue-mt-ns: (Wednesday, 14 February)
• RE: multipleRepresentations test case (and the XHTML Family) (Monday, 12 February)
• multipleRepresentations test case (Friday, 9 February)
• RE: Meeting Agenda for Feb 7th GRDDL WG Meeting 11:00ET (Wednesday, 7 February)
• RE: GRDDL spec ready for release? (Monday, 5 February)

Murray Maloney

• Re: GRDDL end-game survey (Tuesday, 27 February)
• Re: Reviews for GRDDL Spec? (Tuesday, 27 February)
• Re: GRDDL-aware GRDDL (Thursday, 22 February)
• Re: Sending Docs to Rec? (Wednesday, 21 February)
• GRDDL WD comments (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Re: GRDDL-aware agents (Was Re: "GRDDL Agents" ...) (#issue-conformance-labels) (Tuesday, 20 February)
• Re: GRDDL-aware agents (Was Re: "GRDDL Agents" ...) (#issue-conformance-labels) (Tuesday, 20 February)
• GRDDL-aware GRDDL (Tuesday, 20 February)
• GRDDL-aware agents (Was Re: "GRDDL Agents" ...) (Monday, 19 February)
• Re: "GRDDL Agents" section, normative security text for review (# issue-conformance-labels) (Sunday, 18 February)
• Re: "GRDDL Agents" section, normative security text for review (# issue-conformance-labels) (Saturday, 17 February)

Ronald P. Reck

• regrets for March 7 (Wednesday, 28 February)
• late to telecon (Wednesday, 28 February)
• regrets for today (Wednesday, 21 February)
• comments on spec (Wednesday, 7 February)
• Primer comments (Wednesday, 7 February)
• Possible changes for GRDDL primer (Sunday, 4 February)

Simone Onofri

• Re: Reviews for GRDDL Spec? (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Re: GRDDL end-game survey (Tuesday, 27 February)
• Regrets for next teleconference (Monday, 26 February)
• Re: comment (always editorial) for GRDDL spec (Wednesday, 21 February)
• comment (always editorial) for GRDDL spec (Wednesday, 21 February)
• comments (editorial) on GRDDL primer (Wednesday, 21 February)
• GRDDL Labels (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: Primer review : grokXFN.xsl broken? (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: Best way to embed Semantic Data (Saturday, 10 February)
• Re: Best way to embed Semantic Data (Saturday, 10 February)
• Re: Best way to embed Semantic Data (Saturday, 10 February)
• Best way to embed Semantic Data (Friday, 9 February)
• Re: GRDDL spec ready for release? (Monday, 5 February)

Last message date: Wednesday, 28 February 2007 18:49:14 UTC