W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-grddl-wg@w3.org > February 2007

Use-case Revisions.

From: Brian Suda <brian.suda@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2007 16:44:07 +0000
Message-ID: <21e770780702090844x4e098774r5dba6d3627a06320@mail.gmail.com>
To: public-grddl-wg <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>

I have read through the Use-case document. I broke down my edits in 3
categories,
1) Things to still do
2) technical errors
3) grammar issues (feel free to pick and choose how/if you actually
change these)


@@'s that need completion:
1. Introduction: Data and Documents
 the GRDDL Primer Working Draft@@pubfix,

Use case #1
See also: put projects and prototypes here.

Use case #3
See also: put projects and prototypes here.

Technical:
Use case #8
If a page used extensions of HTML that the tidying tool did not
recognized (e.g. RDFa "rel" attribute), these extensions were removed
during the cleaning-up and thus lost for the GRDDL transformation.

I'm not sure what is meant by the "rel" attribute. I am assuming it is
the XSLT2 "role" attribute.

Grammar:
1. Introduction: Data and Documents
From:
Some are more formally defined and others exhibit more loosely-couple semantics.
to:
Some are formally defined and others exhibit more loosely-couple semantics.

having 'more' sounds like you are about to compare 'formally defined'
with something else that doesn't follow.

From:
And how can software determine whether authors of each are in fact the
same person?
to:
And how can software determine whether the authors of each are in fact
the same person?


Use case #3
From:
Reviews published using hReview microformats can be discovered using
existing search services.
to:
Reviews published using the [http://microformats.org/wiki/hreview
hReview] microformat can be discovered using existing search services.

Use case #4
From:
She is concerned by the tension between on one hand the natural heterogeneity
to:
She is concerned by the tension between the natural heterogeneity

From:
Semantic Web technologies to allow here company to
to:
Semantic Web technologies to allow her company to

I'm not sure exactly what the protocol from here is, do i wait to see
if the author excepts the changes, then i give a "Thumbs-up" or
"Thumbs-down"  and/or do i wait until the other reviewers have put in
their changes. Eitherway, assuming the changes are made it looks good
to me.

-brian

-- 
brian suda
http://suda.co.uk
Received on Friday, 9 February 2007 16:44:13 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:11:47 GMT