W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-grddl-wg@w3.org > February 2007

Re: GRDDL spec ready for release? (informative mechanical rules)

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2007 23:05:40 -0600
To: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@ibiblio.org>
Cc: Chimezie Ogbuji <ogbujic@bio.ri.ccf.org>, public-grddl-wg Group <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1170824741.7497.352.camel@dirk>

On Tue, 2007-02-06 at 20:34 -0500, Harry Halpin wrote:
> While GRDDL is seen as a "lightweight" (i.e. should be easy to read and
> implement) spec, a bit of formality can be useful.
> I agree with DanC's idea to put the N3 Rules out in a separate file,

umm... I'm thinking about moving the appendix (that explains
the built-ins used in the rules) to a separate file, but not
the rules themselves. I need the rules right next to the prose
for maintenance reasons.

>  and
> so make the spec look a bit less scary to people that don't know N3
> Rules - but they would still be useful to implementers that know or are
> interested in N3 rules.
> I think Dan's normative formal semantics as given by his text is good
> though, and I would prefer personally if it stayed in the spec.
>              -harry

Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Wednesday, 7 February 2007 05:05:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:39:10 UTC