W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-grddl-wg@w3.org > February 2007

GRDDL Labels

From: Simone Onofri <simone.onofri@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 19:38:49 +0100
Message-ID: <52bd7c3d0702141038o2bbd9b20kaf731ffcf5c2d3a9@mail.gmail.com>
To: "public-grddl-wg Group" <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>

Hi Group,

The use of label can be a good marketing operation that can help GRDDL
diffusion. I'm looking for Microformats [1] diffusion that one of the
best think is the adoption from technorati [2] (it can be also
considered a Microformats Agent?) and as a default standard in blog
systems. So Brian Suda should have more information of me regarding
why Microformats are diffusssed.

Well, the developing of a agent-label, more people should be charmed
by adding a label on his or her product, can be a good marketing move.
On the other hand, we have few time in order to complete process for
documents. But can we talk about labels in another and separated
document under the umbrella of GRDDL? So the use of a label can be in
3 ways:

- Like WCAG, the seal\label is positioned without verification by W3
- Like XHTML\CSS, with validation of use cases output (but need a validator - ?)
- Mixed mode, positioned by *self* verification of use cases output

On the side of Web Authors, for Content and Developers, may be a good
idea (?) also a label for pages that can be gleaned? a button like
"This page uses GRDDL", "Extract RDF from me" or "Glean Me!". I know
this is in particular a marketing issue, but can be a supplementary
booster for technology adoption.

So it's a delicate...

Thanks for attention,

Simone


[1] http://microformats.org/
[2] http://technorati.com/
[3] http://www.progettidiimpresa.it/servizi/notizie/notizie_fase01.aspx?pagina=3&mp=1
Received on Wednesday, 14 February 2007 18:39:20 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:11:47 GMT