W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-grddl-wg@w3.org > February 2007

Re: Comments on draft spec (intro wordsmithing, ns rule bug)

From: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 21:45:31 +0100
Message-ID: <1f2ed5cd0702121245kdd1e2d1g44051651a43c737f@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>
Cc: "Harry Halpin" <hhalpin@ibiblio.org>, public-grddl-wg <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>

Thanks Dan.

On 12/02/07, Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org> wrote:

> > Also, might it be preferable to show this as Turtle/N3, to make it
> > clearer that is isn't just some weird kind of canonical XML
> > expression? (Or at least add another sentence to stress the point).
> Hmm... what's wierd about it? It's totally ordinary RDF/XML, no?

What I had in mind was the perception of someone not familiar with
RDF, where it could look like the object of the exercise was to change
the XML syntax to a normalised form (and for such purposes RDF/XML
syntax might seem strange).  On reflection though I guess anyone
likely to be looking at this spec is unlikely to need a hint on that



Received on Monday, 12 February 2007 20:45:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:39:10 UTC