W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-grddl-wg@w3.org > February 2007

RE: GRDDL spec ready for release?

From: McBride, Brian <brian.mcbride@hp.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2007 09:59:01 -0000
Message-ID: <86FE9B2B91ADD04095335314BE6906E8CFF21F@sdcexc04.emea.cpqcorp.net>
To: "Harry Halpin" <hhalpin@ibiblio.org>, "Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>
Cc: "public-grddl-wg Group" <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>

Have we drained the comments list of comments that, if they came in
again after last call, would force a second last call?

How would folks feel about not taking all three docs rec track?  The
requirements doc has done its job.  Does publishing as a rec accomplish
anything?  The primer isn't normative - so doesn't need to go through
the rec process and could be published as a note.  This might reduce our
workload a bit.

I'm feeling this timescale is a bit optimistic, but that's because I'm
feeling pushed to do the review of the spec I'd like to do before voting
positively for last call.

Brian


> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-grddl-wg-request@w3.org 
> [mailto:public-grddl-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Harry Halpin
> Sent: 02 February 2007 06:27
> To: Dan Connolly
> Cc: public-grddl-wg Group
> Subject: Re: GRDDL spec ready for release?
> 
> 
> Thanks so much for all the hard work on the Spec! I'd like at 
> least one more reviewer besides Ron to give a good read 
> before we release it as a Last Call. However, I do plan to 
> propose all 3 docs go to last call after
> 2 more telecons to  discuss the 2 remaining outstanding 
> issues (#issue-http-header-links and #issue-mt-ns).
> 
>   On
> Thu, 1 Feb 2007, Dan Connolly wrote:
> 
> >
> > It's been over 3 months since we released the GRDDL spec as a WD on 
> > the http://www.w3.org/TR/ page.
> >
> > I added a couple significant chunks of normative material 
> tonight. I 
> > have maybe one more to do (the HTML profile analog of the XML 
> > namespace transformation rules).
> >
> > The biggest editorial TODO is to fix the diagrams.
> >
> > My inspiration on the appendix about a sample implementation is 
> > declining, now that Chime and Jeremy and Dave Beckett are 
> passing most of the tests.
> >
> > So I'm just about ready to ship this thing. I wonder 
> whether to ship 
> > it this week or hold off and do a last call WD in a few weeks.
> >
> > http://www.w3.org/2004/01/rdxh/spec
> > Revision 1.198  2007/02/02 03:32:53
> >
> >
> 
> -- 
>  				--harry
> 
>  	Harry Halpin
>  	Informatics, University of Edinburgh
>          http://www.ibiblio.org/hhalpin
> 
> 
Received on Monday, 5 February 2007 09:59:15 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:11:47 GMT