- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 11:38:13 -0600
- To: public-grddl-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <45DB3205.80801@w3.org>
Harry's giving a talk or something, so I started working on the agenda
Here's a snapshot of what I've got so far. I'm not sync'd with Harry,
so take it with a grain of salt.
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/weekly-agenda
$Revision: 1.88 $ of $Date: 2007/02/20 17:29:01 $
1. *Convene GRDDL WG <http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/> meeting of
2007-02-21T11:00-0500*
* Zakim teleconference bridge
<http://www.w3.org/2002/06/bridge#Zakim>: +1.617.761.6200
code:GRDDL <tel:+1.617.761.6200;postd=47335> (res 2284
<http://www.w3.org/Guide/1998/08/teleconference-calendar.html#s_2284>)
o supplementary IRC chat: #grddl-wg on irc.w3.org port
6665 <irc://irc.w3.org:6665/grddl-wg>
* chair: HarryH
* scribe: ??
* roll call, comments on the agenda.
regrets: Fabien
* propose to note complete without discussion:
o [DONE] ACTION: DanC to address rreck's comments
<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-wg/2007Feb/0042.html>
* *PROPOSED:* to approve GRDDL WG Weekly -- 14 Feb 2007
<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-wg/2007Feb/att-0135/14-grddl-wg-minutes.html>
as a true record
* *PROPOSED: to meet again Wed, 28 Feb 11:00-0500*. scribe
volunteer?
2. * [#issue-conformance-labels]
<http://www.w3.org/2004/01/rdxh/spec#issue-conformance-labels>*
* [DONE]
<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-wg/2007Feb/0140.html>
ACTION: DanC write the draft "conformance label" text, and
ask johnL and rreck and bwm (jeremy) to re-read spec.
"GRDDL-aware agent" or "GRDDL agent"?
3. *[#issue-http-header-links]
<http://www.w3.org/2004/01/rdxh/spec#issue-http-header-links>*
* *ACTION:* bwm (Jeremy) to attempt a test-case for HTTP
Header. See message
<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-wg/2007Feb/0044.html>
from Jeremy. See his comment on mixing Headers and document
profiels
<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-wg/2007Feb/0057.html>.
progress
<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-wg/2007Feb/0152.html>,
testlist2#httpHeaders
<http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/td/testlist2#httpHeaders>
* *ACTION: DanC* DanC to add GRDDL header spec section
* *ACTION: HarryH* to e-mail Ivan to double-check this
[schedule impact of Profile header dependency]
* *ACTION: ?WHO* IETF Link and Profile Headers to be included
as "feature at risk", and dropped if they are not approved
by IETF by time of move to Proposed Recommendation. suggest
reword as: ACTION HarryH: seek registration of the HTTP
Profile header
4. *GRDDL Spec: Last Call*
* *ACTION: Ian* to clarify profileTransformation for JJC
* [DONE]
<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-wg/2007Feb/0118.html>
ACTION: JohnL comments on spec
* [DONE]
<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-wg/2007Feb/0087.html>
ACTION: Danja comments on spec. see also comments on
recursion
<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-wg/2007Feb/0086.html>
5. *Primer Document: Going To Last Call?*
* *ACTION: HarryH* to check those primer fixes [XFN RDF/XML?] in.
* *ACTION:*Danja to approve Primer
* [DONE]
<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-wg/2007Feb/0092.html>
ACTION: HarryH to check Chime's text on HL7 Use-Case into
primer
* [DONE]
<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-wg/2007Feb/0036.html>
ACTION: RReck to approve Primer
* Primer now has Working RDFa example
<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-wg/2007Feb/0093.html>
6. *Use-Case Document: Going To Last Call?*
* *ACTION:*Danja to approve Use-Case Document
* [DONE]
<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-wg/2007Feb/0058.html>
ACTION: BrianS to approve Use-Case Document
note JohnL on use cases
<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-wg/2007Feb/0038.html>
7. *Misc Test-Cases nominated for approval*
* *ACTION:* HarryH to check in a test case on content
negotiation [DONE]. PROPOSE to approve test-case #langconneg
<http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/td/testlist3.html#langconneg>
* *ACTION:* bwm to produce a test case with GRDDL transforms
on two different representations (HTML and SVG) of the same
information resource [DONE]
<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-wg/2007Feb/0060.html>.
8. *tests for [#issue-mt-ns]
<http://www.w3.org/2004/01/rdxh/spec#issue-mt-ns>*
* *ACTION: HarryH* Test case with GRDDL on RDF served as
application/xml
<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-wg/2007Feb/0091.html>
media type.
* *ACTION: Harry* to make 2 test-cases for "what happens if
data-view:transformation is given on an rdf:RDF root
element" serving two different media-types[DONE]. PROPOSE to
approve test-case #grddlonrdf
<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-wg/2007Feb/0071.html>
* *ACTION: danja* sketch the "no, namespace documen triples
aren't part of grddl results" test in e-mail and ask bwm to
check it
9. *tests for [#issue-faithful-infoset]
<http://www.w3.org/2004/01/rdxh/spec#issue-faithful-infoset>*
* *ACTION:* Chime to work on details of 2 allowed results of
xinclude test /2 weeks/
10. *tests for [#issue-base-param]
<http://www.w3.org/2004/01/rdxh/spec#issue-base-param>*
* *ACTION:* DanC to double-check bwm's test-case on
#base-param
<http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/td/testlist1#baseparam>
--
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Tuesday, 20 February 2007 17:38:20 UTC