W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-grddl-wg@w3.org > February 2007

Re: Some spec comments (to .xsl or not to .xsl?)

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 16:27:17 -0500
Message-Id: <98c24d02b09356cacc0c97238c8828db@w3.org>
Cc: "GRDDL Working Group" <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>
To: "McBride, Brian" <brian.mcbride@hp.com>

On Feb 19, 2007, at 11:33 AM, McBride, Brian wrote:
> Section 2 example
> [[
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/td/getAuthor.xsl"
>>
> ]]
>
> Might that better be
>   http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/td/getAuthor
> i.e. drop the commitment to xsl.

Perhaps, but then the test wouldn't run from the local
filesystem. Oops... it already doesn't run from the local
filesystem because of the absolute URI; I moved
it to testlist2 for that reason.

While I often prefer to keep the .xsl out
of the URI, in this "hello world" example, I'm inclined
to keep things somewhat more concrete.

Other opinions?

[... more on other comments separately.]


-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Monday, 19 February 2007 21:27:01 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:11:47 GMT