W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-grddl-wg@w3.org > February 2007

Primer review : grokXFN.xsl broken?

From: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 12:55:42 +0100
Message-ID: <1f2ed5cd0702140355wa842a3ex1c3466e30ff07b27@mail.gmail.com>
To: public-grddl-wg <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>

The RDF/XML example in the Primer, "Booking a Hotel Example"
(apparently as produced by  grokXFN.xsl) doesn't work. Is it
legitimate to use xfn:met here anyway?

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf  ="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns:xfn  ="http://gmpg.org/xfn/11#"
 xmlns:foaf ="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
 xmlns:h    ="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
>

<met xmlns="http://gmpg.org/xfn/11#">
    <rdf:Description>
        <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://peter.example.org/"/>
    </rdf:Description>
</met>

<met xmlns="http://gmpg.org/xfn/11#">
    <rdf:Description>
        <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://john.example.org/"/>
    </rdf:Description>
</met>

<met xmlns="http://gmpg.org/xfn/11#">
    <rdf:Description>
        <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://paul.example.org/"/>
    </rdf:Description>
</met>

</rdf:RDF>

-- 

http://dannyayers.com
Received on Wednesday, 14 February 2007 11:55:50 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:11:47 GMT