Re: Checked in HL7 use case

Yes, I use jena (and could use cwm even!) usually to convert from n3 to rdf.

However, I am trying *not* to do all the work - for example, many of the
namespaces are missing in chime's inline text. Missing namespaces and
"live" files require complete RDF/XML.

Dan Connolly wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-02-11 at 20:43 -0500, Harry Halpin wrote:
>   
>> The primer has now checked in Chime's HL7 use-case. However, until we
>> get a RFC out of the IETF (which should happen!), we cannot use N3
>> notation inline in the primer.
>>     
>
> Hmm... I'm not sure why not? The SPARQL spec uses turtle
> as an editorial device. Why can't the GRDDL primer?
>
>   
>>  Therefore, Chime - can you convert all
>> your examples in n3 into RDF/XML files and send me them, not as text in
>> line, but as files.
>>     
>
> Yes, I suppose any files we use as live primer data should
> be RDF/XML. Do you not have a tool to convert from turtle
> to RDF/XML, Harry? cwm will do it, as will any number
> of Jena/redland/rdflib/4suite tools.
>
>   
>> Also, since this is a health care case John Madden - do you mind
>> checking this out and seeing if it's works? I.e. read the text and then
>> try to *run* the example. It's important to have running code in the
>> primer.
>>
>> Also, Chime - we need references. Could you please send IanD and me the
>> markup for the references
>> that have @@TODOs in the file.
>>
>> It would be good if there was some *problem* that this solved via usage
>> of OWL entailment, but I can't think of one.
>>
>> [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/doc29/primer.html#hl7
>>
>>     


-- 
		-harry

Harry Halpin,  University of Edinburgh 
http://www.ibiblio.org/hhalpin 6B522426