W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-grddl-wg@w3.org > February 2007

RE: Spec section 9 (GRDDL Vocabulary)

From: McBride, Brian <brian.mcbride@hp.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 07:57:57 -0000
Message-ID: <86FE9B2B91ADD04095335314BE6906E8D9411F@sdcexc04.emea.cpqcorp.net>
To: "Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>
Cc: "GRDDL Working Group" <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>

> > I'm not griping;
> oops; did I get defensive?



> >
> > <skulks a bit>I'm not very familiar with N3 rules and was 
> looking for
> > something to explain to me how to interpret the ones in the spec.  I
> > don't think we can assume everyone knows how to read them.  That 
> > doesn't
> > seem to be the sort of thing in the mechanical rules 
> document though.
> OK, I wrote that bit too...
> http://www.w3.org/2004/01/rdxh/spec_rules
> 1.7  2007/02/20 01:38:07
> I could still imagine yanking all that stuff out of the spec, but
> I did manage to go over it with Michael Sperberg-McQueen
> and Sandro Hawke and they did get it. That took almost an
> hour by phone, but that was before the prose I just wrote
> was available.
> Does the prose come close to explaining adequately?

I think it does.  I think that having the rules helps write the prose,
but I think the rules kinda get in the way in the spec, at least for me,
because I'm not familiar with N3 rules.

Received on Tuesday, 20 February 2007 08:00:46 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:11:47 GMT