RE: GRDDL WD comments

I did not make a precise note of Jeremy's plans, but my understanding is
that he is not around this week.

Bwm
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dan Connolly [mailto:connolly@w3.org] 
> Sent: 21 February 2007 22:43
> To: Murray Maloney; McBride, Brian; Jeremy Carroll
> Cc: public-grddl-wg@w3.org
> Subject: Re: GRDDL WD comments
> 
> Murray Maloney wrote:
> >
> > Here are my collected comments on the GRDDL WD
> >
> >     Gleaning Resource Descriptions from Dialects of 
> Languages (GRDDL)
> >     editor's draft $Date: 2007/02/21 16:25:45 $
> >     $Revision: 1.228 $
> 
> Thanks for the careful review...
> > I think that only one of my comments is substantial and it is 
> > identified in HTTP Headers.
> I'll have to think about that one...
> >
> > I have taken the liberty to edit Jeremy's Security section. ...
> Ah... good; I was in a bit of a rush when I pasted that in.
> 
> Brian M, is it likely that Jeremy could look at Murray's 
> suggestions this week?
> You mentioned he was away; I don't recall for how long. It's 
> not critical, but I'm interested to confirm that the meaning 
> hasn't been warped between my edits and Murray's.
> 
> 
> -- 
> Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
> 
> 
>

Received on Thursday, 22 February 2007 07:50:32 UTC