W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-grddl-wg@w3.org > February 2007

Re: Use-case Revisions.

From: Fabien Gandon <Fabien.Gandon@sophia.inria.fr>
Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2007 15:20:42 +0100
Message-ID: <45CF263A.7080004@sophia.inria.fr>
To: Brian Suda <brian.suda@gmail.com>, public-grddl-wg@w3.org

Brian,

Thanks you for your review of the use case document and the detailed 
suggestions.
Most of your changes have been integrated in version v 1.70 2007/02/11 
14:15:34:
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/doc43/scenario-gallery.htm

Detailed of the integration are given below.

Regards,

Fabien


Brian Suda:
> @@'s that need completion:
> 1. Introduction: Data and Documents
> the GRDDL Primer Working Draft@@pubfix,
Done.

> Use case #1
> See also: put projects and prototypes here.
Done.

> Use case #3
> See also: put projects and prototypes here.
Done.

> Use case #8
> If a page used extensions of HTML that the tidying tool did not
> recognized (e.g. RDFa "rel" attribute), these extensions were removed
> during the cleaning-up and thus lost for the GRDDL transformation.
>
> I'm not sure what is meant by the "rel" attribute. I am assuming it is
> the XSLT2 "role" attribute.
In the RDFa syntax, "A |rel| attribute indicates a new statement whose 
predicate is the value of that attribute. The subject of the triple will 
be decided using subject resolution (Section 4.3). The object of the 
triple will be decided using (...) object resolution (Section 4.4). The 
following example indicates that one 'FOAF person' knows another:

<link about="mailto:daniel.brickley@bristol.ac.uk"
      rel="foaf:knows" href="mailto:libby.miller@bristol.ac.uk" /> "

from http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/syntax/#id0x02623d40

However I changed it to the "rev" attribute to make it less ambiguous 
i.e. changed to
"(e.g. the "rev" attribute used in RDFa)"


> Grammar:
> 1. Introduction: Data and Documents
> From:
> Some are more formally defined and others exhibit more loosely-couple 
> semantics.
> to:
> Some are formally defined and others exhibit more loosely-couple 
> semantics.
Done.

> From:
> And how can software determine whether authors of each are in fact the
> same person?
> to:
> And how can software determine whether the authors of each are in fact
> the same person?
Already changed from review of John Clark
see http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-wg/2007Feb/0038.html

> Use case #3
> From:
> Reviews published using hReview microformats can be discovered using
> existing search services.
> to:
> Reviews published using the [http://microformats.org/wiki/hreview
> hReview] microformat can be discovered using existing search services.
Done.(I liked this use of the wiki notation ;-) )
> Use case #4
> From:
> She is concerned by the tension between on one hand the natural 
> heterogeneity
> to:
> She is concerned by the tension between the natural heterogeneity
Prefer not to change this one since the sentence has too many "and".

> From:
> Semantic Web technologies to allow here company to
> to:
> Semantic Web technologies to allow her company to
Already changed from review of John Clark
see http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-wg/2007Feb/0038.html

-- 
Fabien - http://www-sop.inria.fr/acacia/fabien/
Received on Sunday, 11 February 2007 14:22:10 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:11:47 GMT