> Harry Halpin wrote: > > RDFa does a lot of things Embedded RDF does, but (correct me if I'm > > wrong here BenA and IanD), but likely will be a full-fledged first-class > > citizen RDF syntax with Schema data-types, etc. However, it's still in > > the works, so I'd keep it on the radar for future projects. Ben wrote: > RDFa also supports making statements about other URLs, fragments of the > page, bnodes, and striping for deeper structures, so there's more > expressive power there... at the cost of having to use attributes that > don't currently validate (but won't screw up your rendering either.) > > I'd say RDFa should be on your radar right now, but I might be biased :) Thanks Ben for Your clarification. So possibilities through RDFa is more and more powerful. Actually, alas, validation (waiting for XHTML 2) is a issued that must be considered but like You said, I may study also it :) Thanks again, SimoneReceived on Saturday, 10 February 2007 00:07:19 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:11:47 GMT