W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-grddl-wg@w3.org > February 2007

Reviews for GRDDL Spec?

From: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@ibiblio.org>
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 12:02:37 -0500
Message-ID: <45E4642D.60108@ibiblio.org>
To: public-grddl-wg <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>

At our last telecon it seemed that quite a few people were concerned
about not having enough time to thoroughly read the GRDDL Spec (as well
as the Primer, etc.). Therefore, DanC froze the GRDDL Spec Editor's
Draft and everyone has had a week to get in reviews. Yet I see no
reviews. So, I'm going to operate on the assumption that no reviews mean
that the document is satisfactory, and proceed to go to test for
consensus on Last Call.

Also, in order to get people some motivation, I would like to bring
people's attention to some developments. First, GRDDL does have some
people excited - in particular, it seems to have restarted efforts at
developing common micromodels like TagCommons [1]. Also, note "Rusty"
Harold's prediction that GRDDL is "make it or break" it deployment of
the Semantic Web [2].

[1] http://tagcommons.org/
[2]
http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/xml/library/x-xml2007predictions.html

-- 
		-harry

Harry Halpin,  University of Edinburgh 
http://www.ibiblio.org/hhalpin 6B522426
Received on Tuesday, 27 February 2007 17:04:02 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:11:47 GMT