- From: Chimezie Ogbuji <ogbujic@bio.ri.ccf.org>
- Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 14:03:24 -0500 (EST)
- To: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>
- cc: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, "McBride, Brian" <brian.mcbride@hp.com>, GRDDL Working Group <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>
On Tue, 20 Feb 2007, Danny Ayers wrote: > On 19/02/07, Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org> wrote: >> >> On Feb 19, 2007, at 11:33 AM, McBride, Brian wrote: >> > Section 2 example >> > [[ >> > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/td/getAuthor.xsl" >> >> >> > ]] >> > >> > Might that better be >> > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/td/getAuthor >> > i.e. drop the commitment to xsl. >> >> Perhaps, but then the test wouldn't run from the local >> filesystem. Oops... it already doesn't run from the local >> filesystem because of the absolute URI; I moved >> it to testlist2 for that reason. >> >> While I often prefer to keep the .xsl out >> of the URI, in this "hello world" example, I'm inclined >> to keep things somewhat more concrete. >> >> Other opinions? > > Sounds reasonable. No need to mention that: > > <http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/td/getAuthor.xsl> > > might have a Javascript representation... <tongue-in-cheek-response intent='raise an issue'> And what happens if a 'GRDDL-aware Agent' fetches the link and gets a Javscript mime-type? Is it obligated to apply the javascript transformation, does it have enough to know what a 'javascript' transformation entails (from the URL alone)? If it does nothing, is it violating what we are suggesting as a conformance label?... </tongue-in-cheek-response> Chimezie Ogbuji Lead Systems Analyst Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Cleveland Clinic Foundation 9500 Euclid Avenue/ W26 Cleveland, Ohio 44195 Office: (216)444-8593 ogbujic@ccf.org
Received on Tuesday, 20 February 2007 19:03:39 UTC