W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-grddl-wg@w3.org > February 2007

Re: "GRDDL Agents" section (#issue-whichlangs, #issue-output-formats)

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 15:26:28 -0500
Message-Id: <be6e41f7e436da3e23c86808ab6651a4@w3.org>
Cc: "GRDDL Working Group" <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>
To: "Clark, John" <CLARKJ2@ccf.org>

On Feb 19, 2007, at 9:36 AM, Clark, John wrote:
> I think the second step raises a fundamental question that the group  
> had
> mentioned before.

Not just mentioned; asked and answered, I believe...

>> 2. Apply each transformation to obtain a GRDDL result.
> How should a GRDDL Agent do this?  In particular, how should a GRDDL
> Agent use/apply a GRDDL transformation (i.e. a resource)?  If the
> resource has an XSLT 1 representation, then section 6[0] may allow a
> GRDDL Agent to obtain a GRDDL result, but what if the resource doesn't
> have an XSLT 1 representation?

Then you're on your own. i.e. yes, this is left unspecified.

This question has been asked and answered. If there's new information
since these decisions, we can reconsider, as always...

RESOLUTION: to resolve issue-output-formats by (1) adding formal rules  
to cover the case of of the XSLT 1.0 and RDF/XML (2) to allow other  
output formats as exemplified by the Atom/turtle test case

RESOLUTION: to address [#issue-whichlangs] as per the current draft  
(1.83 2006/08/25 20:23:09). SHOULD support XSLT 1; MAY support others.

Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Monday, 19 February 2007 20:26:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:39:10 UTC