W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-grddl-wg@w3.org > February 2007

Primer: Updated Query, RDFa example

From: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@ibiblio.org>
Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2007 10:26:22 -0500
Message-ID: <45C9EF9E.2050007@ibiblio.org>
To: public-grddl-wg <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>

Upon consideration, I would like to keep the Primer and Use-cases in Rec
track, since they are for the most part complete and working and since
our charter [1] states that "tutorial materials and use cases sufficient
to bootstrap adoption of GRDDL" which I think the Primer and Use-cases
cover nicely, and I'd like for us to remain serious to fulfilling this

Thanks for the query IanD! While it could be prettier, it seems to work.
My previous query was trying to state that "Given any number of events,
if they're the same time and place, return the matches" while your query
says "Given 3 events, if they're the same time and place, return the
matches." Clearly the former is a bit more useful to the latter - any
SPARQL experts want to fix this query up any more? But for the time
being it works and I checked it in.

I also completed my action to move Jane's schedule to RDFa - see my
doing so at [2].

However, it appears Fabien's RDFa2RDF.xml stylesheet does not handle
role="cal:Vevent" (I was just trying to follow the RDFa Primer latest
draft [3], which proceeds to mess up the output in RDF/XML and so the
results don't graph merge properly. As Fabien is out of town and Ben is
busy, I suggest that we not put RDFa to the Primer till someone who
knows RDFa can actually sort this out, although this is not in the
critical path to Last Call. Am I wrong or is Fabien wrong or is the RDFa
Primer wrong?



Harry Halpin,  University of Edinburgh 
http://www.ibiblio.org/hhalpin 6B522426
Received on Wednesday, 7 February 2007 15:26:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:39:10 UTC