Re: GRDDL-aware agents (Was Re: "GRDDL Agents" ...) (#issue-conformance-labels)

It looks good.

For the record, I still dislike the fact that "GRDDL Agent" is used but not 
defined.

I still think that step 2, which states "Apply each transformation to 
obtain a GRDDL result."
should say something about the fact that it might not be possible to apply 
transformations
if, for example, the transformation relies on software that is not 
available -- such as awk(1)
on a Windows box. I suppose that most people will recognize that a GRDDL 
agent cannot do
what it cannot do, but it would be nice to see some acknowledgement of that 
fact in the
discussion of a what a GRDDL Agent "should" do.

Just my opinion. I am otherwise quite happy with Dan's latest draft.

Regards,

Murray