- From: Murray Maloney <murray@muzmo.com>
- Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 14:52:01 -0500
- To: GRDDL Working Group <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>
It looks good. For the record, I still dislike the fact that "GRDDL Agent" is used but not defined. I still think that step 2, which states "Apply each transformation to obtain a GRDDL result." should say something about the fact that it might not be possible to apply transformations if, for example, the transformation relies on software that is not available -- such as awk(1) on a Windows box. I suppose that most people will recognize that a GRDDL agent cannot do what it cannot do, but it would be nice to see some acknowledgement of that fact in the discussion of a what a GRDDL Agent "should" do. Just my opinion. I am otherwise quite happy with Dan's latest draft. Regards, Murray
Received on Tuesday, 20 February 2007 19:50:22 UTC